Abstract
Counteractive control theory suggests that the cognitive accessibility of a goal in response to a temptation cue predicts self-regulation of behaviour consistent with that goal. The current study provided a novel test of this effect in the eating domain, exploring the moderating role of trait self-control. A sample of 124 women (18-25 years) completed a lexical decision task to assess cognitive accessibility of the weight-management goal after food temptation priming. Eating self-regulation was operationalised as unhealthy snack food intake measured in a task disguised as a taste-test. Participants completed trait self-control and temptation experience intensity measures. Cognitive accessibility predicted lower food intake, but only among high self-control participants. The relationship was mediated by temptation experience intensity: participants with high cognitive accessibility felt less tempted, and subsequently ate less food. Results suggest that changing the processes underlying the temptation experience, rather than the cognitive accessibility of a goal may more effectively enhance self-regulation among low self-control individuals.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 485-495 |
Number of pages | 11 |
Journal | Motivation and Emotion |
Volume | 38 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Jun 2014 |
Keywords
- Counteractive control theory
- Food intake
- Self-control
- Self-regulation
- Weight-management goal