Abstract
Counteractive control theory suggests that the cognitive accessibility of a goal in response to a temptation cue predicts self-regulation of behaviour consistent with that goal. The current study provided a novel test of this effect in the eating domain, exploring the moderating role of trait self-control. A sample of 124 women (18-25 years) completed a lexical decision task to assess cognitive accessibility of the weight-management goal after food temptation priming. Eating self-regulation was operationalised as unhealthy snack food intake measured in a task disguised as a taste-test. Participants completed trait self-control and temptation experience intensity measures. Cognitive accessibility predicted lower food intake, but only among high self-control participants. The relationship was mediated by temptation experience intensity: participants with high cognitive accessibility felt less tempted, and subsequently ate less food. Results suggest that changing the processes underlying the temptation experience, rather than the cognitive accessibility of a goal may more effectively enhance self-regulation among low self-control individuals.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 485-495 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | Motivation and Emotion |
| Volume | 38 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jun 2014 |
Keywords
- Counteractive control theory
- Food intake
- Self-control
- Self-regulation
- Weight-management goal
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Resisting temptation of unhealthy food: Interaction between temptation-elicited goal activation and self-control'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver