Response to Commentary on: Bright et al. (2018) Internal validation of STRmix™ – A multi laboratory response to PCAST, Forensic Science International: Genetics, 34: 11–24

John S. Buckleton, Jo Anne Bright, Anne Ciecko, Maarten Kruijver, Benjamin Mallinder, Alan Magee, Simon Malsom, Tamyra Moretti, Steven Weitz, Todd Bille, Sarah Noël, Rachel H. Oefelein, Brian Peck, Timothy Kalafut, Duncan A. Taylor

Research output: Contribution to journalLetter

Abstract

We are writing in response to a recent letter appearing in Forensic Science International: Genetics entitled “Commentary on: Bright et al. (2018) internal validation of STRmix™ – A multi laboratory response to PCAST, Forensic Science International: Genetics, 34: 11–24″, authored by Dennis McNevin, Kirsty Wright, Janet Chaseling, and Mark Barash [1] (hereafter MWCB).
Original languageEnglish
Article number102198
JournalForensic Science International: Genetics
Volume44
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2020
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Daubert list
  • Probabilistic Genotyping
  • PG software

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Response to Commentary on: Bright et al. (2018) Internal validation of STRmix™ – A multi laboratory response to PCAST, Forensic Science International: Genetics, 34: 11–24'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this