Restoration: 'Garden of Eden' unrealistic

Martin F. Breed; Andrew J. Lowe; Peter E. Mortimer

doi:10.1038/533469d

Restoration: 'Garden of Eden' unrealistic

Martin F. Breed, Andrew J. Lowe, Peter E. Mortimer

Research output: Contribution to journal › Letter › peer-review

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We consider the proposed use of a 'pre-degradation' state as a reference baseline for damaged ecosystems to be unrealistic (J. Kotiaho et al. Nature 532, 37; 2016). Instead of this 'Garden of Eden' baseline, we argue that restoration should respond to current drivers of biodiversity loss and decline in ecosystem function and services.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	469
Number of pages	1
Journal	Nature
Volume	533
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1038/533469d
Publication status	Published - 25 May 2016
Externally published	Yes

Keywords

pre-degradation
damaged ecosystems
native species
invasive species

Access to Document

10.1038/533469dLicence: In Copyright

Cite this

@article{6850c80a44494788a1861d028e87bdf4,

title = "Restoration: 'Garden of Eden' unrealistic",

abstract = "We consider the proposed use of a 'pre-degradation' state as a reference baseline for damaged ecosystems to be unrealistic (J. Kotiaho et al. Nature 532, 37; 2016). Instead of this 'Garden of Eden' baseline, we argue that restoration should respond to current drivers of biodiversity loss and decline in ecosystem function and services.",

keywords = "pre-degradation, damaged ecosystems, native species, invasive species",

author = "Breed, {Martin F.} and Lowe, {Andrew J.} and Mortimer, {Peter E.}",

year = "2016",

month = may,

day = "25",

doi = "10.1038/533469d",

language = "English",

volume = "533",

pages = "469",

journal = "Nature",

issn = "0028-0836",

publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Restoration

T2 - 'Garden of Eden' unrealistic

AU - Breed, Martin F.

AU - Lowe, Andrew J.

AU - Mortimer, Peter E.

PY - 2016/5/25

Y1 - 2016/5/25

N2 - We consider the proposed use of a 'pre-degradation' state as a reference baseline for damaged ecosystems to be unrealistic (J. Kotiaho et al. Nature 532, 37; 2016). Instead of this 'Garden of Eden' baseline, we argue that restoration should respond to current drivers of biodiversity loss and decline in ecosystem function and services.

AB - We consider the proposed use of a 'pre-degradation' state as a reference baseline for damaged ecosystems to be unrealistic (J. Kotiaho et al. Nature 532, 37; 2016). Instead of this 'Garden of Eden' baseline, we argue that restoration should respond to current drivers of biodiversity loss and decline in ecosystem function and services.

KW - pre-degradation

KW - damaged ecosystems

KW - native species

KW - invasive species

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84969834662&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1038/533469d

DO - 10.1038/533469d

M3 - Letter

C2 - 27225110

AN - SCOPUS:84969834662

VL - 533

SP - 469

JO - Nature

JF - Nature

SN - 0028-0836

ER -

Restoration: 'Garden of Eden' unrealistic

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this