Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Rethinking secondary disinfection in direct potable reuse: a risk perspective on opportunistic pathogens and antimicrobial resistance

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Direct potable reuse (DPR) represents a technologically advanced and tightly controlled water supply strategy. However, legacy practices such as the emphasis on log-reduction credits for enteric pathogens and the routine application of secondary disinfection may not be appropriate nor effective for managing opportunistic pathogens (OPs) and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in DPR systems. This paper critiques the use of disinfectant residuals from the perspective of microbial ecology, biofilm dynamics, growth and persistence of OPs, and AMR mechanisms. A case it presented that secondary disinfection can drive the selective pressure and subsequent enrichment of resistant taxa, destabilise advanced-treated water quality, and undermine the engineered principles underpinning DPR. Alternative approaches that prioritise infrastructure integrity, proactive monitoring, and ecological control may offer a more sustainable and resilient strategy for DPR, providing superior public health protection with a reduced AMR risk.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)153-169
Number of pages17
JournalWater Reuse
Volume16
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2026
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • biofilm
  • disinfectant residual
  • drinking water distribution system
  • environmental pathogens
  • QMRA

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Rethinking secondary disinfection in direct potable reuse: a risk perspective on opportunistic pathogens and antimicrobial resistance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this