Review finds that ablative therapies do not improve clinical or angiographic outcomes compared to balloon dilation

Jabitt A. Bittl, D. P. Chew, E. J. Topol

Research output: Contribution to journal › Short survey › peer-review

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	221-222
Number of pages	2
Journal	Evidence-based Cardiovascular Medicine
Volume	8
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebcm.2004.06.004
Publication status	Published - 1 Sept 2004

Access to Document

@article{48c5ca98ec3d495bafcddb48d0a70040,

title = "Review finds that ablative therapies do not improve clinical or angiographic outcomes compared to balloon dilation",

author = "Bittl, {Jabitt A.} and Chew, {D. P.} and Topol, {E. J.}",

year = "2004",

month = sep,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1016/j.ebcm.2004.06.004",

language = "English",

volume = "8",

pages = "221--222",

journal = "Evidence-based Cardiovascular Medicine",

issn = "1361-2611",

publisher = "Churchill Livingstone",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Review finds that ablative therapies do not improve clinical or angiographic outcomes compared to balloon dilation

AU - Bittl, Jabitt A.

AU - Chew, D. P.

AU - Topol, E. J.

PY - 2004/9/1

Y1 - 2004/9/1

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=4344665211&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ebcm.2004.06.004

DO - 10.1016/j.ebcm.2004.06.004

M3 - Short survey

AN - SCOPUS:4344665211

SN - 1361-2611

VL - 8

SP - 221

EP - 222

JO - Evidence-based Cardiovascular Medicine

JF - Evidence-based Cardiovascular Medicine

IS - 3

ER -