TY - JOUR
T1 - Revised stratigraphy and chronology for Homo floresiensis at Liang Bua in Indonesia
AU - Sutikna, Thomas
AU - Tocheri, Matthew W.
AU - Morwood, Michael J.
AU - Saptomo, E. Wahyu
AU - Jatmiko,
AU - Awe, Rokus Due
AU - Wasisto, Sri
AU - Westaway, Kira E.
AU - Aubert, Maxime
AU - Li, Bo
AU - Zhao, Jian Xin
AU - Storey, Michael
AU - Alloway, Brent V.
AU - Morley, Mike W.
AU - Meijer, Hanneke J.M.
AU - Van Den Bergh, Gerrit D.
AU - Grün, Rainer
AU - Dosseto, Anthony
AU - Brumm, Adam
AU - Jungers, William L.
AU - Roberts, Richard G.
PY - 2016/4/21
Y1 - 2016/4/21
N2 - Homo floresiensis, a primitive hominin species discovered in Late Pleistocene sediments at Liang Bua (Flores, Indonesia), has generated wide interest and scientific debate. A major reason this taxon is controversial is because the H. floresiensis-bearing deposits, which include associated stone artefacts and remains of other extinct endemic fauna, were dated to between about 95 and 12 thousand calendar years (kyr) ago. These ages suggested that H. floresiensis survived until long after modern humans reached Australia by ∼50 kyr ago. Here we report new stratigraphic and chronological evidence from Liang Bua that does not support the ages inferred previously for the H. floresiensis holotype (LB1), ∼18 thousand calibrated radiocarbon years before present (kyr cal. bp), or the time of last appearance of this species (about 17 or 13-11 kyr cal. bp). Instead, the skeletal remains of H. floresiensis and the deposits containing them are dated to between about 100 and 60 kyr ago, whereas stone artefacts attributable to this species range from about 190 to 50 kyr in age. Whether H. floresiensis survived after 50 kyr ago - potentially encountering modern humans on Flores or other hominins dispersing through southeast Asia, such as Denisovans - is an open question.
AB - Homo floresiensis, a primitive hominin species discovered in Late Pleistocene sediments at Liang Bua (Flores, Indonesia), has generated wide interest and scientific debate. A major reason this taxon is controversial is because the H. floresiensis-bearing deposits, which include associated stone artefacts and remains of other extinct endemic fauna, were dated to between about 95 and 12 thousand calendar years (kyr) ago. These ages suggested that H. floresiensis survived until long after modern humans reached Australia by ∼50 kyr ago. Here we report new stratigraphic and chronological evidence from Liang Bua that does not support the ages inferred previously for the H. floresiensis holotype (LB1), ∼18 thousand calibrated radiocarbon years before present (kyr cal. bp), or the time of last appearance of this species (about 17 or 13-11 kyr cal. bp). Instead, the skeletal remains of H. floresiensis and the deposits containing them are dated to between about 100 and 60 kyr ago, whereas stone artefacts attributable to this species range from about 190 to 50 kyr in age. Whether H. floresiensis survived after 50 kyr ago - potentially encountering modern humans on Flores or other hominins dispersing through southeast Asia, such as Denisovans - is an open question.
KW - stratigraphy
KW - chronology
KW - Homo floresiensis
KW - uranium-series dating
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84964426590&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://purl.org/au-research/grants/ARC/DP0770234
UR - http://purl.org/au-research/grants/ARC/DP1093049
UR - http://purl.org/au-research/grants/ARC/DE140100254
UR - http://purl.org/au-research/grants/ARC/DE130101560
UR - http://purl.org/au-research/grants/ARC/FT14010038
UR - http://purl.org/au-research/grants/ARC/FL130100116
U2 - 10.1038/nature17179
DO - 10.1038/nature17179
M3 - Article
C2 - 27027286
AN - SCOPUS:84964426590
SN - 0028-0836
VL - 532
SP - 366
EP - 369
JO - Nature
JF - Nature
IS - 7599
ER -