Rural training pathways: the return rate of doctors to work in the same region as their basic medical training

Matthew R McGrail, Belinda O’Sullivan, Deborah J Russell

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    4 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Background: Limited evidence exists about the extent to which doctors are returning to rural region(s) where they had previously trained. This study aims to investigate the rate at which medical students who have trained for 12months or more in a rural region return to practice in that same region in their early medical career. A secondary aim is to investigate whether there is an independent or additional association with the effect of longer duration of rural exposure in a region (18-24months) and for those completing both schooling and training in the same rural region. Methods: The outcome was rural region of work, based on postcode of work location in 2017 for graduates spanning 1-9years post-graduation, for one large medical program in Victoria, Australia. Region of rural training, combined with region of secondary schooling and duration of rural training, was explored for its association with region of practice. A multinomial logistic regression model, accounting for other covariates, measured the strength of association with practising in the same rural region as where they had trained. Results: Overall, 357/2451 (15%) graduates were working rurally, with 90/357 (25%) working in the same rural region as where they did rural training. Similarly, 41/170 (24%) were working in the same region as where they completed schooling. Longer duration (18-24 vs 12months) of rural training (relative risk ratio, RRR, 3.37, 1.89-5.98) and completing both schooling and training in the same rural region (RRR: 4.47, 2.14-9.36) were associated with returning to practice in the same rural region after training. Conclusions: Medical graduates practising rurally in their early career (1-9years post-graduation) are likely to have previous connections to the region, through either their basic medical training, their secondary schooling, or both. Social accountability of medical schools and rural medical workforce outcomes could be improved by policies that enable preferential selection and training of prospective medical students from rural regions that need more doctors, and further enhanced by longer duration of within-region training.

    Original languageEnglish
    Article number56
    Pages (from-to)1-10
    Number of pages10
    JournalHuman Resources for Health
    Volume16
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 22 Oct 2018

    Bibliographical note

    This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver(http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated

    Keywords

    • Education
    • Location
    • Recruitment
    • Retention
    • Rural pathways
    • Rural training
    • Workforce

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Rural training pathways: the return rate of doctors to work in the same region as their basic medical training'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this