Safety of Varenicline Tartrate and Counseling Versus Counseling Alone for Smoking Cessation: A Randomized Controlled Trial for Inpatients (STOP Study)

Kristin Carson, Brian Smith, Malcolm Brinn, Matthew Peters, Robert Fitridge, Simon Koblar, Jim Jannes, Kuljit Singh, Antony Veale, Sharon Goldsworthy, John Litt, David Edwards, Khin Hnin, Adrian Esterman

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    7 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Introduction: Inpatient medical settings offer an opportunistic environment for initiating smoking cessation interventions to patients reflecting on their health. Current evidence has shown the superior efficacy of varenicline tartrate (VT) for smoking cessation compared with other tobacco cessation therapies; however, recent evidence also has highlighted concerns about the safety and tolerability of VT. Given these apprehensions, we aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of VT plus quitlinecounseling compared to quitline-counseling alone in the inpatient medical setting. Methods: Adult patients (n = 392, 20-75 years) admitted with a smoking-related illnesses to 3 hospitals were randomized to receive either 12 weeks of varenicline tartrate (titrated from 0.5 mg daily to 1 mg twice daily) plus quitline-counseling (VT+C), (n = 196) or quitline-counseling alone (n = 196). Results: VT was well tolerated in the inpatient setting among subjects admitted with acute smoking-related illnesses (mean age 52.8 ± 2.89 and 53.7 ± 2.77 years in the VT+C and counseling alone groups, respectively). The most common self-reported adverse event during the 12-week treatment phase was nausea (16.3% in the VT+C group compared with 1.5% in the counseling alone group). Thirteen deaths occurred during the study period (n = 6 were in the VT+C arm compared with n = 7 in the counseling alone arm). All of these subjects had known comorbidities or developed underlying comorbidities. Conclusions: VT appears to be a safe and well-tolerated opportunistic treatment for inpatient smokers who have related chronic disease. Based on the proven efficacy of varenicline from outpatient studies and our recent inpatient evidence, we suggest it be considered as part of standard care in the hospital setting.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1495-1502
    Number of pages8
    JournalNicotine and Tobacco Research
    Volume16
    Issue number11
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2014

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Safety of Varenicline Tartrate and Counseling Versus Counseling Alone for Smoking Cessation: A Randomized Controlled Trial for Inpatients (STOP Study)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Carson, K., Smith, B., Brinn, M., Peters, M., Fitridge, R., Koblar, S., Jannes, J., Singh, K., Veale, A., Goldsworthy, S., Litt, J., Edwards, D., Hnin, K., & Esterman, A. (2014). Safety of Varenicline Tartrate and Counseling Versus Counseling Alone for Smoking Cessation: A Randomized Controlled Trial for Inpatients (STOP Study). Nicotine and Tobacco Research, 16(11), 1495-1502. https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntu112