TY - JOUR
T1 - Semantic prediction-errors are context-dependent
T2 - An ERP study
AU - Jack, Bradley N.
AU - Le Pelley, Mike E.
AU - Griffiths, Oren Dennis
AU - Luque, David
AU - Whitford, Thomas J.
PY - 2019/3/1
Y1 - 2019/3/1
N2 - The human brain is an efficient, adaptive, and predictive machine, constructing a generative model of the environment that we then perceive and become conscious of. Here, we show that different types of prediction-errors – the discrepancies between top-down expectations and bottom-up sensory input – are integrated across processing levels and sensory modalities of the cortical hierarchy. We designed a novel, hybrid protocol in which five prediction-establishing sounds were played in rapid succession (e.g., “meow” “meow” “meow” etc.), followed by either a standard (e.g., “meow”) or a deviant (e.g., “woof”) prime sound, then a visual target word that was either congruent or incongruent (e.g., “cat” or “dog”) with the prime sound. We found that the deviants elicited a more negative voltage than the standards at about 150 ms – the mismatch negativity (MMN), an event-related potential (ERP) sensitive to low-level perceptual violations – and that the incongruent words elicited a more negative voltage than the congruent words at about 350 ms – the N400, an ERP sensitive to high-level semantic violations. We also found that the N400 was context-dependent: the N400 was larger when the target words were preceded by a standard than a deviant. Our results suggest that perceptual prediction-errors modulate subsequent semantic prediction-errors. We conclude that our results are consistent with one of the most important assumptions of predictive coding theories: hierarchical prediction-error processing.
AB - The human brain is an efficient, adaptive, and predictive machine, constructing a generative model of the environment that we then perceive and become conscious of. Here, we show that different types of prediction-errors – the discrepancies between top-down expectations and bottom-up sensory input – are integrated across processing levels and sensory modalities of the cortical hierarchy. We designed a novel, hybrid protocol in which five prediction-establishing sounds were played in rapid succession (e.g., “meow” “meow” “meow” etc.), followed by either a standard (e.g., “meow”) or a deviant (e.g., “woof”) prime sound, then a visual target word that was either congruent or incongruent (e.g., “cat” or “dog”) with the prime sound. We found that the deviants elicited a more negative voltage than the standards at about 150 ms – the mismatch negativity (MMN), an event-related potential (ERP) sensitive to low-level perceptual violations – and that the incongruent words elicited a more negative voltage than the congruent words at about 350 ms – the N400, an ERP sensitive to high-level semantic violations. We also found that the N400 was context-dependent: the N400 was larger when the target words were preceded by a standard than a deviant. Our results suggest that perceptual prediction-errors modulate subsequent semantic prediction-errors. We conclude that our results are consistent with one of the most important assumptions of predictive coding theories: hierarchical prediction-error processing.
UR - http://purl.org/au-research/grants/ARC/DP140104394
UR - http://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/DP170103094
UR - http://purl.org/au-research/grants/ARC/FT100100260
UR - http://purl.org/au-research/grants/ARC/DE150100667
UR - http://purl.org/au-research/grants/NHMRC/1090507
U2 - 10.1016/j.brainres.2018.10.034
DO - 10.1016/j.brainres.2018.10.034
M3 - Article
SN - 0006-8993
VL - 1706
SP - 86
EP - 92
JO - Brain Research
JF - Brain Research
ER -