Abstract
This paper explores tensions navigated by researchers and project leaders when involving people with disability as experts in co-design and in the core team. Part of an evaluation aiming to improve paid employment of people with intellectual disability is used to consider this work. Assemblage analysis of the data assisted in identifying a range of material and social conditions, flows, and factors that de- and re-territorialise power in the co-design process. The expertise of people with disability informed research design. Structural conditions of funding and institutional support were foundational to the co-design. These included accessible practices, core roles for people with disability and resolving ableist conditions. Power shifts were easily undermined by institutionalised norms that disrespected the co-design contributions. When people in decision-making positions and allies recognised the value of codesigning research, it was key to centring valuable knowledge in articulating key issues, methodology, and analysis.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 259-280 |
Number of pages | 22 |
Journal | Disability and Society |
Volume | 40 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2025 |
Keywords
- assemblage method
- Co-design
- disability
- inclusive research
- power shift