Short-term Outcomes in Infants after General Anesthesia with Low-dose Sevoflurane/ Dexmedetomidine/ Remifentanil versus Standard-dose Sevoflurane (the TREX Trial)

Rita Saynhalath, Nicola Disma, Fiona J. Taverner, Britta S. von Ungern-Sternberg, Dean Andropoulos, Ann S. Ng, Benjamin B. Shields, Francesca Izzo, Paul Lee-Archer, Mary Ellen McCann, Luigi Montagnini, Beate Kuppers, Elena Lenares, Suzette Sheppard, Jurgen C. de Graaff, Katherine J. Lee, Xiaofang Wang, Peter Szmuk, Andrew J. Davidson, Justin J. Skownothe TREX (Trial Remifentanil DEXmedetomidine) consortium

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)
7 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: The Trial Remifentanil DEXmedetomidine (TREX) trial aimed to determine whether, in children less than 2 yr old, low-dose sevoflurane/ dexmedetomidine/remifentanil anesthesia is superior to standard-dose sevoflurane anesthesia in terms of global cognitive function at 3 yr of age. The aim of the current secondary analyses was to compare incidence of intraoperative hypotension and bradycardia, postoperative pain, time to recovery, need for treatment of intraoperative hypotension and bradycardia, incidence of light anesthesia and need for treatment, need for postoperative pain medications, and morbidity and mortality outcomes at 5 days between the two arms. Methods: This phase III randomized active controlled, parallel group, assessor blinded, multicenter, superiority trial was performed in 20 centers in Australia, Italy, and the United States. A total of 455 infants less than 2 yr of age expected to undergo general anesthesia for at least 2 h were enrolled. They were randomized between low-dose sevoflurane/dexmedetomidine/remifentanil anesthesia and standard-dose sevoflurane. The short-term perioperative outcomes noted above were compared between these two groups. results: There was less hypotension (risk difference, −11.6%; 95% CI, −18.9 to −4.3%) and more bradycardia (risk difference, 18.2%; 95% CI, 8.8 to 27.7%) in the low-dose sevoflurane/dexmedetomidine/remifentanil anesthesia compared to the standard-dose sevoflurane arm. There were more patients with episodes of light anesthesia (89 vs. 4), and protocol abandon-ments (1 vs. 0) in the low-dose sevoflurane/dexmedetomidine/remifentanil anesthesia arm. Time from eye opening to postanesthesia care unit discharge was similar in both arms, as were morbidity and mortality. One patient in each arm suffered a life-threatening event, but neither suffered long-term sequelae. conclusions: These early postoperative results suggest that in children less than 2 yr of age receiving greater than 2 h of general anesthesia, the low-dose sevoflurane/dexmedetomidine/remifentanil anesthesia technique and the standard sevoflurane anesthesia technique are broadly clinically similar, with no clear evidence to support choosing one technique over the other.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1075-1085
Number of pages11
JournalAnesthesiology
Volume141
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2024

Keywords

  • General Anesthesia
  • Infants
  • Short-Term Outcomes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Short-term Outcomes in Infants after General Anesthesia with Low-dose Sevoflurane/ Dexmedetomidine/ Remifentanil versus Standard-dose Sevoflurane (the TREX Trial)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this