TY - JOUR
T1 - Sleepy, tired, drowsy, and fatigue have different meanings for a university student sample
AU - Long, Hannah
AU - Scott, Hannah
AU - Lack, Leon
PY - 2022/5/1
Y1 - 2022/5/1
N2 - Study Objectives: This pilot study aimed to investigate differences in the semantic meanings that individuals attribute to the words “sleepy,” “fatigued,” “tired,” and “drowsy.” Methods: Ninety-six undergraduate students ranked the target words on 3 independent dimensions (evaluative, potency, and activity) to assess their meaning using the semantic differential technique. Participants also completed online questionnaires to assess their sleep difficulties and current states of sleepiness and fatigue. Results: There were significant differences between all 4 words in connotative meaning on the evaluative dimension, P < .05 for all post-hoc comparisons, with the differences largest between “sleepy” and “fatigued.” “Drowsy” was significantly closer in meaning to “sleepy” than to “fatigued,” P = .04, and “tired” was not significantly closer in meaning to “sleepy” or “fatigued,” P = .13. No significant association was found between insomnia severity index scores and “sleepy” ratings, r
(s) = 0.08, P = .42, but a small effect was found with “fatigued” ratings, r
(s) = 0.24, P = .02. Conclusions: These preliminary findings indicate that individuals consider these words as distinct concepts, relatively unaffected by the current severity of their insomnia symptoms. This adds to the argument for not using these words interchangeably, which we encourage sleep medicine researchers and clinicians to consider when employing these words in research and clinical practice.
AB - Study Objectives: This pilot study aimed to investigate differences in the semantic meanings that individuals attribute to the words “sleepy,” “fatigued,” “tired,” and “drowsy.” Methods: Ninety-six undergraduate students ranked the target words on 3 independent dimensions (evaluative, potency, and activity) to assess their meaning using the semantic differential technique. Participants also completed online questionnaires to assess their sleep difficulties and current states of sleepiness and fatigue. Results: There were significant differences between all 4 words in connotative meaning on the evaluative dimension, P < .05 for all post-hoc comparisons, with the differences largest between “sleepy” and “fatigued.” “Drowsy” was significantly closer in meaning to “sleepy” than to “fatigued,” P = .04, and “tired” was not significantly closer in meaning to “sleepy” or “fatigued,” P = .13. No significant association was found between insomnia severity index scores and “sleepy” ratings, r
(s) = 0.08, P = .42, but a small effect was found with “fatigued” ratings, r
(s) = 0.24, P = .02. Conclusions: These preliminary findings indicate that individuals consider these words as distinct concepts, relatively unaffected by the current severity of their insomnia symptoms. This adds to the argument for not using these words interchangeably, which we encourage sleep medicine researchers and clinicians to consider when employing these words in research and clinical practice.
KW - drowsy
KW - excessive daytime sleepiness
KW - fatigue
KW - insomnia
KW - sleep
KW - treatment terminology
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85129780031&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.5664/jcsm.9780
DO - 10.5664/jcsm.9780
M3 - Article
C2 - 35023472
AN - SCOPUS:85129780031
SN - 1550-9389
VL - 18
SP - 1235
EP - 1241
JO - Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine
JF - Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine
IS - 5
ER -