Abstract
Whilst slum upgrading is often seen as one of the more effective ways of tackling urban poverty, the approaches taken by slum upgrading policies vary considerably, as do their degrees of success. This article reports on a comparative study of slum upgrading experiences in Bandung, Indonesia; Quezon City, Philippines; and Hanoi, Vietnam. It was carried out using a modification of the sustainable livelihoods framework that considered upgrading policies in a hierarchy of levels. The study demonstrated the importance of some form of security of tenure (the definition of which varied across the case studies), a need for sustainable economic activities to be incorporated into the upgrading, the critical importance of governance and institutions and significance of the contributions of the community and elements of civil society.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 162-169 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | Habitat International |
| Volume | 39 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jul 2013 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 1 No Poverty
-
SDG 11 Sustainable Cities and Communities
-
SDG 17 Partnerships for the Goals
Keywords
- Indonesia
- Philippines
- Slum upgrading
- South East Asia
- Vietnam
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Slum upgrading and urban governance: Case studies in three South East Asian cities'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver