Social behaviour in an Australian allodapine bee Exoneura (Brevineura) xanthoclypeata (Hymenoptera : Apidae)

Simon M. Tierney, Michael P. Schwarz, M. Adams

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    27 Citations (Scopus)


    The allodapine bees are well suited for comparative studies of social evolution because of the wide variation in social behavior within and between genera. There are three main clades in the endemic Australian genus Exoneura. Two groups (Exoneura sensu stricto and Exoneurella) have received extensive study. In this paper we provide the first detailed study of social behaviour in the third group, Brevineura, based on a healthland population of Exoneura (B.) xanthoclypeata Rayment. This species has two seasonal pulses of egg-laying and brood rearing occurs throughout most of the year, including winter. This extended period of egg-laying and brood development differs from the two other Australian Exoneura subgenera and provides extensive opportunities for eusocial-like sib-rearing. Dissection data indicate that reproductive differentiation among adult nestmates is well developed and dependent on body size, with smaller females being mostly or entirely non-reproductive. Per capita brood production is dramatically higher in multi-female nests than in single-female nests and relatedness between adult nestmates is moderately high (r = 0.05). These two factors suggest that local fitness enhancement may be occurring and our limited sex allocation data suggest female-biased ratios. Because of the opportunities for sib-rearing in this species, local fitness enhancement has the potential to lower selective thresholds for eusociality.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)385-398
    Number of pages14
    JournalAustralian Journal of Zoology
    Issue number4
    Publication statusPublished - 1997


    Dive into the research topics of 'Social behaviour in an Australian allodapine bee Exoneura (Brevineura) xanthoclypeata (Hymenoptera : Apidae)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this