Projects per year
Abstract
The South Australian Department of Human Services (DHS) is expanding its commitment to addressing chronic food insecurity through the development of a Social Supermarket (SSM) Program. This initiative builds on a growing body of evidence and practice that highlights the limitations of conventional food relief and the need for more inclusive, empowering, and outcomes-focused models.
Social supermarkets combine low-cost retail-style grocery shopping with access to social services and inclusion opportunities – providing affordable food in a dignified environment that promotes agency and participation, whilst promoting pathways out of food insecurity through connection and empowerment.
Evidence from South Australia and from international examples shows that SSMs can enhance food security, financial wellbeing, and social connectedness. Their impact is greatest when embedded within broader community infrastructure, offering opportunities for social connection and wraparound supports. These models are adaptable to local needs and can be delivered in partnership by community organisations, local government, and other service providers. Different elements of the SSM offering can be delivered by different partners through co-located, mobile or pop-up formats and referral systems.
This report synthesises local SSM experience and international evidence, and presents a new theory of change, updated implementation elements (building on the 2020–22 SA pilots), and recommended assessment criteria for program design. The report outlines four program guidelines to inform the commissioning and funding of social supermarkets:
1. Deliver three core service components Funded SSMs should deliver (1) access to affordable, nutritious, and culturally-appropriate food through reliable supply arrangements and a retail-like environment that supports choice and dignity; (2) opportunities for social connection, participation, and skill-building; and (3) integrated access to social supports and services, including co-located services or warm referrals, and system navigation. All three components must be delivered within a clearly defined organisational model that considers business model5 financial viability and sustainability beyond program funding, and clearly articulates the service delivery structure6.
2. Follow guiding principles and good practices SSMs should be guided by the values and practices outlined in the South Australian Food Relief Charter, the Food Relief Good Practice Guide, and the DHS Social Impact Framework. These frameworks support safe, inclusive, and impactful service delivery.
3. Collaborate with partners SSMs should be embedded in local, place-based partnerships—working with community organisations, local government, and other DHS-funded programs to enable integrated service delivery and share resources and expertise, to maximise collective community impact.
4. Participate in capacity building and collective evaluation Funded organisations should engage in sector-wide efforts for knowledge-sharing and co-creation, peer support, and impact evaluation, coordinated by DHS and its capacity building partners. This includes contributing to shared monitoring and evaluation activities and pursuing outcomes such as improved food security, financial wellbeing, social inclusion, and overall wellbeing and quality of life.
This report provides a foundation for commissioning a new generation of social supermarkets that are inclusive, sustainable, and capable of addressing the root causes of food insecurity. It is intended to guide funding decisions, support DHS program design, and ensure alignment with broader social impact goals in South Australia.
Social supermarkets combine low-cost retail-style grocery shopping with access to social services and inclusion opportunities – providing affordable food in a dignified environment that promotes agency and participation, whilst promoting pathways out of food insecurity through connection and empowerment.
Evidence from South Australia and from international examples shows that SSMs can enhance food security, financial wellbeing, and social connectedness. Their impact is greatest when embedded within broader community infrastructure, offering opportunities for social connection and wraparound supports. These models are adaptable to local needs and can be delivered in partnership by community organisations, local government, and other service providers. Different elements of the SSM offering can be delivered by different partners through co-located, mobile or pop-up formats and referral systems.
This report synthesises local SSM experience and international evidence, and presents a new theory of change, updated implementation elements (building on the 2020–22 SA pilots), and recommended assessment criteria for program design. The report outlines four program guidelines to inform the commissioning and funding of social supermarkets:
1. Deliver three core service components Funded SSMs should deliver (1) access to affordable, nutritious, and culturally-appropriate food through reliable supply arrangements and a retail-like environment that supports choice and dignity; (2) opportunities for social connection, participation, and skill-building; and (3) integrated access to social supports and services, including co-located services or warm referrals, and system navigation. All three components must be delivered within a clearly defined organisational model that considers business model5 financial viability and sustainability beyond program funding, and clearly articulates the service delivery structure6.
2. Follow guiding principles and good practices SSMs should be guided by the values and practices outlined in the South Australian Food Relief Charter, the Food Relief Good Practice Guide, and the DHS Social Impact Framework. These frameworks support safe, inclusive, and impactful service delivery.
3. Collaborate with partners SSMs should be embedded in local, place-based partnerships—working with community organisations, local government, and other DHS-funded programs to enable integrated service delivery and share resources and expertise, to maximise collective community impact.
4. Participate in capacity building and collective evaluation Funded organisations should engage in sector-wide efforts for knowledge-sharing and co-creation, peer support, and impact evaluation, coordinated by DHS and its capacity building partners. This includes contributing to shared monitoring and evaluation activities and pursuing outcomes such as improved food security, financial wellbeing, social inclusion, and overall wellbeing and quality of life.
This report provides a foundation for commissioning a new generation of social supermarkets that are inclusive, sustainable, and capable of addressing the root causes of food insecurity. It is intended to guide funding decisions, support DHS program design, and ensure alignment with broader social impact goals in South Australia.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Place of Publication | South Australia |
| Publisher | Centre for Social Impact, Flinders University |
| Commissioning body | Government of South Australia, Department of Human Services |
| Number of pages | 39 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 25 Jun 2025 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 1 No Poverty
-
SDG 2 Zero Hunger
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
Keywords
- Social Supermarket
- Food Security
- Food Relief
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Social supermarket program: design guidelines: A report with recommendations for the Department of Human Services SA'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.-
Social supermarket program design project
Pettman, T. (Chief Investigator (Project Lead)), Bogomolova, S. (Chief Investigator) & Goodwin-Smith, I. (Chief Investigator)
28/02/25 → 31/12/26
Project: Research
-
Towards 'zero hunger': improving food relief services in Australia
Bogomolova, S. (Chief Investigator (Project Lead)), Coveney, J. (Chief Investigator), Goodwin-Smith, I. (Chief Investigator), Buckley, J. (Chief Investigator) & Pettman, T. (Chief Investigator)
9/06/21 → 7/06/26
Project: Research
-
Part discount grocer, part social connection: Defining Elements of Social Supermarkets
Pettman, T., Pontifex, K., Williams, C., Wildgoose, D., Dent, C., Fairbrother, G., Chapman, J., Spreckley, R., Goodwin-Smith, I. & Bogomolova, S., Oct 2024, In: Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly. 53, 5, p. 1306-1328 23 p.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Open AccessFile1 Citation (Scopus)174 Downloads (Pure) -
Evaluation of the Social Supermarket model across three new sites. Report to Wellbeing SA.
Pettman, T., Dent, C., Goodwin-Smith, I. & Bogomolova, S., Apr 2022, South Australia: Flinders University. 31 p.Research output: Book/Report › Commissioned report › peer-review
Open AccessFile328 Downloads (Pure) -
Evaluation of The Food Centre Client Outcomes Pilot Study
Bogomolova, S., Goodwin-Smith, I. & Faghidno, S., 6 May 2021, South Australia: University of South Australia. 90 p.Research output: Book/Report › Commissioned report › peer-review
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver