Some Challenges Posed by Coal Bed Methane Regional Assessment Modeling

Catherine Moore, John Doherty, Stephen Howell, Leon Erriah

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    10 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Coal measures (coal bearing rock strata) can contain large reserves of methane. These reserves are being exploited at a rapidly increasing rate in many parts of the world. To extract coal seam gas, thousands of wells are drilled at relatively small spacing to depressurize coal seams to induce desorption and allow subsequent capture of the gas. To manage this process effectively, the effect of coal bed methane (CBM) extraction on regional aquifer systems must be properly understood and managed. Groundwater modeling is an integral part of this management process. However, modeling of CBM impacts presents some unique challenges, as processes that are operative at two very different scales must be adequately represented in the models. The impacts of large-scale gas extraction may be felt over a large area, yet despite the significant upscaling that accompanies construction of a regional model, near-well conditions and processes cannot be ignored. These include the highly heterogeneous nature of many coal measures, and the dual-phase flow of water and gas that is induced by coal seam depressurization. To understand these challenges, a fine-scale model was constructed incorporating a detailed representation of lithological heterogeneity to ensure that near-well processes and conditions could be examined. The detail of this heterogeneity was at a level not previously employed in models built to assess groundwater impacts arising from CBM extraction. A dual-phase reservoir simulator was used to examine depressurization and water desaturation processes in the vicinity of an extractive wellfield within this fine-scale model. A single-phase simulator was then employed so that depressurization errors incurred by neglecting near-well, dual-phase flow could be explored. Two models with fewer lithological details were then constructed in order to examine the nature of depressurization errors incurred by upscaling and to assess the interaction of the upscaling process with the requirement for adequate representation of near-source, dual-phase processes.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)737-747
    Number of pages11
    JournalGroundwater
    Volume53
    Issue number5
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2015

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Some Challenges Posed by Coal Bed Methane Regional Assessment Modeling'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Moore, C., Doherty, J., Howell, S., & Erriah, L. (2015). Some Challenges Posed by Coal Bed Methane Regional Assessment Modeling. Groundwater, 53(5), 737-747. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwat.12276