Stroke Rehabilitation in the Philippines: An Audit Study

Consuelo Gonzalez-Suarez, Karen Grimmer, Isaias Alipio, Elda Grace Anota-Canencia, Maria Luisa Santos-Carpio, Janine Margarita Dizon, Lauren Liao, Jan Tyrone Cabrera, Romil Martinez, Eulalia Beredo, Carolina Valdecanas, Vania Yu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)
182 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Purpose: Although cerebrovascular accident is a leading cause of mortality in the Philippines, there has never been a national survey of stroke client descriptors and rehabilitation practices. This paper reports on data from the audit of stroke care for inpatients in hospitals serviced by physiatrists. 

Method: Audit was done of the medical records of stroke clients admitted to hospitals with rehabilitation units. Performance indicators for timely referral to rehabilitation were applied. 

Results: A total of 1683 records were audited. The majority of clients had cerebral infarct followed by cerebral haemorrhage. The median length of stay was 7 days; stay was lengthier for haemorrhagic strokes. Only 54.1% of the clients were referred to rehabilitation, with a median delay of 3 days between admission and referral to rehabilitation. 25.4% of the clients had early referral to rehabilitation. 39.2% of the 1397 clients were referred to rehabilitation earlier than 2 days before discharge. 

Conclusion: This Filipino study provides valuable information on stroke types and prevalence, demographics and rehabilitation practices. Despite the prevalence of post-stroke rehabilitation, it has been underutilised in the management of stroke.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)44-67
Number of pages24
JournalDisability, CBR and Inclusive Development
Volume26
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 24 Oct 2015
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Audit study
  • Philippines
  • Stroke rehabilitation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Stroke Rehabilitation in the Philippines: An Audit Study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this