Submission in response to the Regulatory Options of Automated Vehicles Discussion Paper

Mark Brady; Tania Leiman; Kylie Burns; Kieran Tranter

Submission in response to the Regulatory Options of Automated Vehicles Discussion Paper

Mark Brady, Tania Leiman, Kylie Burns, Kieran Tranter

Research output: Other contribution

Abstract

We are researchers into automated vehicles and law and negligence and personal injury compensation law with Flinders University and Griffith University.

Our submission directly responds to chapter 11 of the NTC May 2016 Discussion Paper. We argue that there is significant complexity concerning liability for increasingly automated vehicles in Australia and that there is a more urgent need for reform than suggested in the Discussion Paper.

Original language	English
Number of pages	56
Publication status	Submitted - 2016

Keywords

Automated Vehicles
Regulatory Options
Personal Injury

Cite this

@misc{57ebba3c136745dea4fdb793fdaec960,

title = "Submission in response to the Regulatory Options of Automated Vehicles Discussion Paper",

abstract = "We are researchers into automated vehicles and law and negligence and personal injury compensation law with Flinders University and Griffith University.Our submission directly responds to chapter 11 of the NTC May 2016 Discussion Paper. We argue that there is significant complexity concerning liability for increasingly automated vehicles in Australia and that there is a more urgent need for reform than suggested in the Discussion Paper.",

keywords = "Automated Vehicles, Regulatory Options, Personal Injury",

author = "Mark Brady and Tania Leiman and Kylie Burns and Kieran Tranter",

year = "2016",

language = "English",

type = "Other",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Submission in response to the Regulatory Options of Automated Vehicles Discussion Paper

AU - Brady, Mark

AU - Leiman, Tania

AU - Burns, Kylie

AU - Tranter, Kieran

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - We are researchers into automated vehicles and law and negligence and personal injury compensation law with Flinders University and Griffith University.Our submission directly responds to chapter 11 of the NTC May 2016 Discussion Paper. We argue that there is significant complexity concerning liability for increasingly automated vehicles in Australia and that there is a more urgent need for reform than suggested in the Discussion Paper.

AB - We are researchers into automated vehicles and law and negligence and personal injury compensation law with Flinders University and Griffith University.Our submission directly responds to chapter 11 of the NTC May 2016 Discussion Paper. We argue that there is significant complexity concerning liability for increasingly automated vehicles in Australia and that there is a more urgent need for reform than suggested in the Discussion Paper.

KW - Automated Vehicles

KW - Regulatory Options

KW - Personal Injury

UR - https://www.ntc.gov.au/media/1426/ntc-discussion-paper-regulatory-options-for-automated-vehicles-may-2016-kieran-tranter-griffith-law-school-jul-2016.

M3 - Other contribution

ER -

Submission in response to the Regulatory Options of Automated Vehicles Discussion Paper

Abstract

Keywords

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this