Supporting community-dwelling older people with cognitive impairment to stay at home: A modelled cost analysis

Suzanne M. Dyer; Lachlan B. Standfield; Nicola Fairhall; Ian D. Cameron; Meredith Gresham; Henry Brodaty; Maria Crotty

doi:10.1111/ajag.12818

Supporting community-dwelling older people with cognitive impairment to stay at home: A modelled cost analysis

Suzanne M. Dyer
, Lachlan B. Standfield
, Nicola Fairhall
, Ian D. Cameron
, Meredith Gresham
, Henry Brodaty
, Maria Crotty

College of Medicine and Public Health

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

158 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Objective: To model the potential financial implications of Australian programs supporting cognitively impaired community-dwelling older people. Methods: Markov cohort models of (a) an observational study of a residential dyadic training program for carers and people with dementia (GTSAH) and (b) a frailty intervention (FIT) in a cognitively impaired subgroup. Direct health and social welfare costs accrued over 5 years (2018 $AUD prices) were captured. GTSAH costs $3755, FIT costs $1834, and permanent residential aged care (P-RAC) costs $237 per day. Results: Modelling predicted costs break even in approximately 5 months for GTSAH and 7 months for FIT, after which these interventions saved funds. The primary driver of savings was the P-RAC cost (discounted at 5%/annum), at $121 030 for GTSAH vs $231 193 for standard care; and $47 857 with FIT vs $111 359 for standard care. Conclusions: Programs supporting cognitively impaired community-dwelling older people could be financially beneficial; further evaluation and implementation would be a worthwhile investment.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	e506-e514
Number of pages	9
Journal	Australasian Journal on Ageing
Volume	39
Issue number	4
Early online date	1 Jul 2020
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1111/ajag.12818
Publication status	Published - Dec 2020

Bibliographical note

This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License [CC BY], which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

SDG 1 No Poverty

Keywords

caregivers
dementia
health resource
home care
nursing homes

Access to Document

10.1111/ajag.12818Licence: CC BY

Published versionFinal published version, 526 KBLicence: CC BY

Cite this

@article{2599444441b84c2193d8a7f54fcf7c69,

title = "Supporting community-dwelling older people with cognitive impairment to stay at home: A modelled cost analysis",

abstract = "Objective: To model the potential financial implications of Australian programs supporting cognitively impaired community-dwelling older people. Methods: Markov cohort models of (a) an observational study of a residential dyadic training program for carers and people with dementia (GTSAH) and (b) a frailty intervention (FIT) in a cognitively impaired subgroup. Direct health and social welfare costs accrued over 5 years (2018 \$AUD prices) were captured. GTSAH costs \$3755, FIT costs \$1834, and permanent residential aged care (P-RAC) costs \$237 per day. Results: Modelling predicted costs break even in approximately 5 months for GTSAH and 7 months for FIT, after which these interventions saved funds. The primary driver of savings was the P-RAC cost (discounted at 5\%/annum), at \$121 030 for GTSAH vs \$231 193 for standard care; and \$47 857 with FIT vs \$111 359 for standard care. Conclusions: Programs supporting cognitively impaired community-dwelling older people could be financially beneficial; further evaluation and implementation would be a worthwhile investment.",

keywords = "caregivers, dementia, health resource, home care, nursing homes",

author = "Dyer, \{Suzanne M.\} and Standfield, \{Lachlan B.\} and Nicola Fairhall and Cameron, \{Ian D.\} and Meredith Gresham and Henry Brodaty and Maria Crotty",

note = "This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License [CC BY], which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.",

year = "2020",

month = dec,

doi = "10.1111/ajag.12818",

language = "English",

volume = "39",

pages = "e506--e514",

journal = "Australasian Journal on Ageing",

issn = "1440-6381",

publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Supporting community-dwelling older people with cognitive impairment to stay at home

T2 - A modelled cost analysis

AU - Dyer, Suzanne M.

AU - Standfield, Lachlan B.

AU - Fairhall, Nicola

AU - Cameron, Ian D.

AU - Gresham, Meredith

AU - Brodaty, Henry

AU - Crotty, Maria

N1 - This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License [CC BY], which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PY - 2020/12

Y1 - 2020/12

N2 - Objective: To model the potential financial implications of Australian programs supporting cognitively impaired community-dwelling older people. Methods: Markov cohort models of (a) an observational study of a residential dyadic training program for carers and people with dementia (GTSAH) and (b) a frailty intervention (FIT) in a cognitively impaired subgroup. Direct health and social welfare costs accrued over 5 years (2018 $AUD prices) were captured. GTSAH costs $3755, FIT costs $1834, and permanent residential aged care (P-RAC) costs $237 per day. Results: Modelling predicted costs break even in approximately 5 months for GTSAH and 7 months for FIT, after which these interventions saved funds. The primary driver of savings was the P-RAC cost (discounted at 5%/annum), at $121 030 for GTSAH vs $231 193 for standard care; and $47 857 with FIT vs $111 359 for standard care. Conclusions: Programs supporting cognitively impaired community-dwelling older people could be financially beneficial; further evaluation and implementation would be a worthwhile investment.

AB - Objective: To model the potential financial implications of Australian programs supporting cognitively impaired community-dwelling older people. Methods: Markov cohort models of (a) an observational study of a residential dyadic training program for carers and people with dementia (GTSAH) and (b) a frailty intervention (FIT) in a cognitively impaired subgroup. Direct health and social welfare costs accrued over 5 years (2018 $AUD prices) were captured. GTSAH costs $3755, FIT costs $1834, and permanent residential aged care (P-RAC) costs $237 per day. Results: Modelling predicted costs break even in approximately 5 months for GTSAH and 7 months for FIT, after which these interventions saved funds. The primary driver of savings was the P-RAC cost (discounted at 5%/annum), at $121 030 for GTSAH vs $231 193 for standard care; and $47 857 with FIT vs $111 359 for standard care. Conclusions: Programs supporting cognitively impaired community-dwelling older people could be financially beneficial; further evaluation and implementation would be a worthwhile investment.

KW - caregivers

KW - dementia

KW - health resource

KW - home care

KW - nursing homes

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85087169614

UR - http://purl.org/au-research/grants/NHMRC/9100000

U2 - 10.1111/ajag.12818

DO - 10.1111/ajag.12818

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85087169614

SN - 1440-6381

VL - 39

SP - e506-e514

JO - Australasian Journal on Ageing

JF - Australasian Journal on Ageing

IS - 4

ER -

Supporting community-dwelling older people with cognitive impairment to stay at home: A modelled cost analysis

Abstract

Bibliographical note

UN SDGs

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this