TY - JOUR
T1 - Sustainable bio-plastic production through landfill methane recycling
AU - Chidambarampadmavathy, Karthigeyan
AU - Karthikeyan, Obulisamy Parthiba
AU - Heimann, Kirsten Ruth
PY - 2017
Y1 - 2017
N2 - Plastics are an indispensable part of day-to-day life. Environmental implications of these non-biodegradable plastics in landfills raise major concerns. Use of biodegradable plastics is the best alternative as they are environmental friendly, with great recycling potential, and can be produced using renewable resources such as waste materials, methane (CH4) and simple carbon sources. Whilst the biodegradable plastics are eco-friendly, they pose a risk of emitting CH4 under anaerobic conditions in landfills. As a cradle-to-cradle approach, landfill CH4 could be effectively used for biodegradable plastic production by methanotrophs. This review briefly reviews approaches to plastic disposal, alternatives to plastic waste management and outlines issues arising. The focus of the review is to examine the potential for cost-effective production of polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) using methanotrophs for manufacturing biodegradable plastics. The data input into this analysis is derived from Australian landfill CH4 emissions, the average PHB content of methanotrophs and applied to a case-scenario in Sydney, Australia. The results suggest that this approach to biodegradable plastic production can be economically viable and price-competitive with synthetic plastics. In our case study, landfills were sized small, medium and large (5,000, 35,000 and 230,000 t of waste per year, respectively). In small landfills, 162 t of CH4 can be recovered to produce 71 t of PHB per year, whilst in large landfills 7,480 t of CH4 can be recovered to produce 3,252 t of PHB. The cost of PHB production can be reduced to 1.5–2.0 AUD meeting the market value of synthetic plastic by increasing production volumes through building a centralised extraction and refinement facility suitable for large metropolitan cities.
AB - Plastics are an indispensable part of day-to-day life. Environmental implications of these non-biodegradable plastics in landfills raise major concerns. Use of biodegradable plastics is the best alternative as they are environmental friendly, with great recycling potential, and can be produced using renewable resources such as waste materials, methane (CH4) and simple carbon sources. Whilst the biodegradable plastics are eco-friendly, they pose a risk of emitting CH4 under anaerobic conditions in landfills. As a cradle-to-cradle approach, landfill CH4 could be effectively used for biodegradable plastic production by methanotrophs. This review briefly reviews approaches to plastic disposal, alternatives to plastic waste management and outlines issues arising. The focus of the review is to examine the potential for cost-effective production of polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) using methanotrophs for manufacturing biodegradable plastics. The data input into this analysis is derived from Australian landfill CH4 emissions, the average PHB content of methanotrophs and applied to a case-scenario in Sydney, Australia. The results suggest that this approach to biodegradable plastic production can be economically viable and price-competitive with synthetic plastics. In our case study, landfills were sized small, medium and large (5,000, 35,000 and 230,000 t of waste per year, respectively). In small landfills, 162 t of CH4 can be recovered to produce 71 t of PHB per year, whilst in large landfills 7,480 t of CH4 can be recovered to produce 3,252 t of PHB. The cost of PHB production can be reduced to 1.5–2.0 AUD meeting the market value of synthetic plastic by increasing production volumes through building a centralised extraction and refinement facility suitable for large metropolitan cities.
KW - Bio-plastics
KW - Bioremediation
KW - Greenhouse gas emission abatement
KW - Methane
KW - Methanotrophs
KW - Polyhydroxyalkanoates
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85010647585&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.rser.2016.12.083
DO - 10.1016/j.rser.2016.12.083
M3 - Review article
SN - 1364-0321
VL - 71
SP - 555
EP - 562
JO - RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS
JF - RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS
ER -