Abstract
This chapter examines the likely constraints and freedoms confronted by Sykes surrounding the collection of data for The Society of Captives. While Sykes would certainly have faced many key decisions concerning how best to immerse himself and sustain his presence within Trenton Prison, the chapter shows how the historical context (chiefly, lack of extensive external ethical oversight, provision of unfettered access to the field, and absence of a “publish or perish” mentality) enabled the successful completion of what remains one of the longest prison-based ethnographies. Finally, it addresses the question of whether and how “slow science” might survive in the current era.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Power and pain in the modern prison |
Subtitle of host publication | The society of captives revisited |
Editors | Ben Crewe, Andrew Goldsmith, Mark Halsey |
Place of Publication | Oxford, United Kingdom |
Publisher | Oxford University Press |
Chapter | 2 |
Pages | 36-53 |
Number of pages | 18 |
ISBN (Electronic) | 9780191891762 |
ISBN (Print) | 9780198859338 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2022 |
Keywords
- Sykes
- prison
- ethnography
- method
- ethics
- slow science