Synthesis of magnetic nanoparticles using spinning disc processing

Nigel Smith, Colin L. Raston, Martin Saunders, Robert Woodward

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Spinning disc processing (SDP) has been utilized to modify the aqueous, inverse co-precipitation method for the production of Fe3O4 nanomaterials patented by Massart in 1982 [1]. Size distributions within the 3 to 12 nm range have been produced, with narrow particle size spread, on a rapid, continuous basis. It has been demonstrated that this processing technique results in a general reduction in particle size. Further, the role and limits of applicability of tartaric acid as a surfactant for particle formation control have been established to lie within the range of 1:1 to 10:1, [tartaric] to [Fe], with concentrations in excess resulting in amorphous materials and below this having minimal effect. Marginal, high concentrations have been demonstrated to occasionally result in particles with induced twinning and lattice dislocation defects.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publication2006 NSTI Nanotechnology Conference and Trade Show - NSTI Nanotech 2006 Technical Proceedings
Pages343-346
Number of pages4
Publication statusPublished - 8 Dec 2006
Externally publishedYes
Event2006 NSTI Nanotechnology Conference and Trade Show - NSTI Nanotech 2006 Technical Proceedings - Boston, MA, United States
Duration: 7 May 200611 May 2006

Publication series

Name2006 NSTI Nanotechnology Conference and Trade Show - NSTI Nanotech 2006 Technical Proceedings
Volume1

Conference

Conference2006 NSTI Nanotechnology Conference and Trade Show - NSTI Nanotech 2006 Technical Proceedings
Country/TerritoryUnited States
CityBoston, MA
Period7/05/0611/05/06

Keywords

  • Co-precipitation
  • Magnetite
  • Nanoparticle
  • SDP
  • Synthesis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Synthesis of magnetic nanoparticles using spinning disc processing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this