Systems, Self, and Sovereignty: Non-Indigenous Practitioners Negotiate Whiteness in Aboriginal Partnerships: Non-Indigenous Practitioners Negotiate Whiteness in Aboriginal Partnerships

Tania Searle, Monique Mulholland

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    2 Citations (Scopus)
    42 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Australia is built upon a foundation of colonial conquest, and it continues to implement government policies and systems of management based on a colonising logic and the denial of Indigenous sovereignty. This study employed qualitative methods and discourse analysis to draw on the experiences of six non-Indigenous Australians employed by the South Australian Government in Aboriginal partnerships and natural resource management. Drawing on critical Whiteness studies, the article reveals that participants in this cohort are largely critical of colonial structures of government and the inequalities that arise. Despite this critical awareness, there was often a difficulty in finding a language to describe the fog of Whiteness, along with the tendency to describe ecological knowledge at the expense of more complex issues of First Nations sovereignty.

    Original languageEnglish
    Article number5
    Number of pages22
    JournalInternational Indigenous Policy Journal
    Volume9
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 18 Feb 2018

    Keywords

    • Decolonisation
    • First Nations or Indigenous
    • Government partnerships
    • Natural resource management
    • Whiteness

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Systems, Self, and Sovereignty: Non-Indigenous Practitioners Negotiate Whiteness in Aboriginal Partnerships: Non-Indigenous Practitioners Negotiate Whiteness in Aboriginal Partnerships'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this