The aboriginal birth cohort study: When is a cohort study not a cohort design?

Dorothy E.M. Mackerras, Gurmeet R. Singh, Susan Sayers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Aims: The paper describes how a variety of different epidemiological study designs can be applied to data arising from a single prospective study. Methods: An overview of the data collection phases of the Aboriginal Birth Cohort Study is given. We illustrate how different research questions that require different analytical designs can be asked of the data collected in the present study. Results: With reference to five generic questions in health research, we showed how sixteen specific questions could be addressed in the Aboriginal Birth Cohort Study. These referred to a range of analytical designs. Conclusion: Readers need to take care not to confuse the overall design of a study with the design of a specific analysis. When conducting systematic literature reviews, studies should be classified according to the analytical design used in the specific report included in the review and not according to the design of the overall project.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)171-176
Number of pages6
JournalNutrition and Dietetics
Volume67
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2010
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Aboriginal
  • Cohort
  • Epidemiologic methods
  • Systematic reviews
  • Urban-rural

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The aboriginal birth cohort study: When is a cohort study not a cohort design?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this