TY - JOUR
T1 - The acceptability of intimate partner violence screening and response among refugee women accessing Australian resettlement services
AU - Spence, Nigel
AU - Spangaro, Jo
AU - Man, Nicola
AU - Cameron, Jacqui
AU - Hegarty, Kelsey
AU - Koziol-McLain, Jane
AU - McMahon, Tadgh
AU - Perry-Indermaur, Astrid
AU - Toole-Anstey, Chye
AU - Walsh, Jeannette
AU - Zwi, Anthony
PY - 2024/12/18
Y1 - 2024/12/18
N2 - Screening and response for intimate partner violence (IPV) is recommended for women in priority populations and is implemented in health services across diverse jurisdictions. Most women experiencing IPV strongly support screening, however this is untested with refugee women in resettlement contexts. Around one third of refugee women in Australia experience IPV and face multiple post-migration challenges. SAHAR (Safety and Health after Arrival) tested IPV screening using the ACTS tool, brief intervention, and referral with women accessing four settlement support services. Women attending sites during the study period were invited to participate in a three month follow up survey with participation by 321/375 women recruited (86%). Acceptability of IPV screening was assessed against (i) levels of comfort with the IPV screening questions and (ii) strength of agreement/disagreement with settlement services asking women about being frightened, controlled or hurt by their partners. Of participants who recalled the screening, 93% reported being very or moderately comfortable with being asked the questions (89% who had experienced IPV; 94% of those with no IPV identified). For all participants, 84% strongly or somewhat agreed with services asking the questions, with no significant difference in agreement between disclosing and non-disclosing groups. Those with no recall of the questions had lower overall agreement and higher disagreement than those who recalled the questions (88% and 10%). Acceptability was not associated with age, country of origin, household composition, time since arrival or number of prior service visits. Participants identified ‘care shown by the worker’, ‘talking to someone in my own language’, ‘trust in the privacy of the service’, and ‘talking to a female worker’ as the factors most important for encouraging discussion of IPV. High acceptance of IPV screening by refugee women supports consideration of implementation across settlement services, a key access point for refugee women with diverse needs.
AB - Screening and response for intimate partner violence (IPV) is recommended for women in priority populations and is implemented in health services across diverse jurisdictions. Most women experiencing IPV strongly support screening, however this is untested with refugee women in resettlement contexts. Around one third of refugee women in Australia experience IPV and face multiple post-migration challenges. SAHAR (Safety and Health after Arrival) tested IPV screening using the ACTS tool, brief intervention, and referral with women accessing four settlement support services. Women attending sites during the study period were invited to participate in a three month follow up survey with participation by 321/375 women recruited (86%). Acceptability of IPV screening was assessed against (i) levels of comfort with the IPV screening questions and (ii) strength of agreement/disagreement with settlement services asking women about being frightened, controlled or hurt by their partners. Of participants who recalled the screening, 93% reported being very or moderately comfortable with being asked the questions (89% who had experienced IPV; 94% of those with no IPV identified). For all participants, 84% strongly or somewhat agreed with services asking the questions, with no significant difference in agreement between disclosing and non-disclosing groups. Those with no recall of the questions had lower overall agreement and higher disagreement than those who recalled the questions (88% and 10%). Acceptability was not associated with age, country of origin, household composition, time since arrival or number of prior service visits. Participants identified ‘care shown by the worker’, ‘talking to someone in my own language’, ‘trust in the privacy of the service’, and ‘talking to a female worker’ as the factors most important for encouraging discussion of IPV. High acceptance of IPV screening by refugee women supports consideration of implementation across settlement services, a key access point for refugee women with diverse needs.
KW - timate partner violence (IPV)
KW - refugee women
KW - Australian resettlement services
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85212681747&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://purl.org/au-research/grants/ARC/LP190101183
U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0315061
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0315061
M3 - Article
C2 - 39693303
AN - SCOPUS:85212681747
SN - 1932-6203
VL - 19
JO - PLoS One
JF - PLoS One
IS - 12
M1 - e0315061
ER -