TY - JOUR
T1 - The Acute Effects of Wind Farm Versus Road Traffic Noise Onset on Electroencephalographically Defined Arousal From Sleep
T2 - Findings From an In-Laboratory Randomised Controlled Trial
AU - Lechat, Bastien
AU - Micic, Gorica
AU - Scott, Hannah
AU - Dunbar, Claire
AU - Nguyen, Duc Phuc
AU - Hansen, Kristy
AU - Toson, Barbara
AU - Liebich, Tessa
AU - Decup, Felix
AU - Vakulin, Andrew
AU - Lovato, Nicole
AU - Lack, Leon
AU - Hansen, Colin
AU - Bruck, Dorothy
AU - Chai-Coetzer, Ching Li
AU - Mercer, Jeremy
AU - Doolan, Con
AU - Zajamsek, Branko
AU - Catcheside, Peter
PY - 2025/10/12
Y1 - 2025/10/12
N2 - Wind farm noise (WFN) exposure effects on sleep remain poorly understood. This study compared the probability of electroencephalographically (EEG) defined arousal from established sleep following WFN versus road traffic noise (RTN) onset. Sixty-eight adults were studied in a sleep laboratory on one night with repeated 20-s WFN and RTN exposures. Following ≥ 2 min of established sleep and ≥ 20-s between noise exposures, pre-recorded WFN or RTN samples were reproduced at sound pressure levels (SPLs) of 30, 40, and 50 dBA in random order. The primary outcome was the probability of EEG-defined arousal events (> 3 s EEG shifts to faster frequencies) following the onset of each noise exposure. Awakening responses (> 15 s EEG frequency shifts) were also evaluated. Noise type, SPL, and sleep stage effects on arousal and awakening response probabilities were evaluated using mixed effects logistic regression analyses. Of 68 participants, 62 (mean ± SD aged 49 ± 20 years, 35 females) had sufficient replicates of noise exposure data for analysis. Arousal response probabilities were low, particularly in deep sleep, but showed a significant noise type-by-SPL interaction (χ2 = 13, p = 0.001), with marginally but significantly lower WFN compared to RTN arousal probabilities at 40 dBA (mean [95% CI]: 2.1 [1.5, 2.9] vs. 3.2 [2.4, 4.2]%, p = 0.016) and 50 dBA (5.0 [4.0, 6.2] vs. 8.6 [6.9, 10.6]%, p < 0.001). Awakenings were infrequent (< 4% at 50 dBA) but showed similar effects. These findings show that acute WFN onset is marginally less sleep disruptive than road traffic noise events of equivalent SPL ≥ 40 dBA.
AB - Wind farm noise (WFN) exposure effects on sleep remain poorly understood. This study compared the probability of electroencephalographically (EEG) defined arousal from established sleep following WFN versus road traffic noise (RTN) onset. Sixty-eight adults were studied in a sleep laboratory on one night with repeated 20-s WFN and RTN exposures. Following ≥ 2 min of established sleep and ≥ 20-s between noise exposures, pre-recorded WFN or RTN samples were reproduced at sound pressure levels (SPLs) of 30, 40, and 50 dBA in random order. The primary outcome was the probability of EEG-defined arousal events (> 3 s EEG shifts to faster frequencies) following the onset of each noise exposure. Awakening responses (> 15 s EEG frequency shifts) were also evaluated. Noise type, SPL, and sleep stage effects on arousal and awakening response probabilities were evaluated using mixed effects logistic regression analyses. Of 68 participants, 62 (mean ± SD aged 49 ± 20 years, 35 females) had sufficient replicates of noise exposure data for analysis. Arousal response probabilities were low, particularly in deep sleep, but showed a significant noise type-by-SPL interaction (χ2 = 13, p = 0.001), with marginally but significantly lower WFN compared to RTN arousal probabilities at 40 dBA (mean [95% CI]: 2.1 [1.5, 2.9] vs. 3.2 [2.4, 4.2]%, p = 0.016) and 50 dBA (5.0 [4.0, 6.2] vs. 8.6 [6.9, 10.6]%, p < 0.001). Awakenings were infrequent (< 4% at 50 dBA) but showed similar effects. These findings show that acute WFN onset is marginally less sleep disruptive than road traffic noise events of equivalent SPL ≥ 40 dBA.
KW - electroencephalogram
KW - environmental noise
KW - road traffic
KW - sleep disruption
KW - sleep disturbance
KW - sleep quality
KW - wind farm
KW - wind turbine
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105019503207&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://purl.org/au-research/grants/NHMRC/GNT1113571
U2 - 10.1111/jsr.70227
DO - 10.1111/jsr.70227
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105019503207
SN - 0962-1105
JO - Journal of Sleep Research
JF - Journal of Sleep Research
M1 - e70227
ER -