TY - JOUR
T1 - The androgen receptor is a tumor suppressor in estrogen receptor–positive breast cancer
AU - Hickey, Theresa E.
AU - Selth, Luke A.
AU - Chia, Kee Ming
AU - Laven-Law, Geraldine
AU - Milioli, Heloisa H.
AU - Roden, Daniel
AU - Jindal, Shalini
AU - Hui, Mun
AU - Finlay-Schultz, Jessica
AU - Ebrahimie, Esmaeil
AU - Birrell, Stephen N.
AU - Stelloo, Suzan
AU - Iggo, Richard
AU - Alexandrou, Sarah
AU - Caldon, C. Elizabeth
AU - Abdel-Fatah, Tarek M.
AU - Ellis, Ian O.
AU - Zwart, Wilbert
AU - Palmieri, Carlo
AU - Sartorius, Carol A.
AU - Swarbrick, Alex
AU - Lim, Elgene
AU - Carroll, Jason S.
AU - Tilley, Wayne D.
PY - 2021/2
Y1 - 2021/2
N2 - The role of the androgen receptor (AR) in estrogen receptor (ER)-α-positive breast cancer is controversial, constraining implementation of AR-directed therapies. Using a diverse, clinically relevant panel of cell-line and patient-derived models, we demonstrate that AR activation, not suppression, exerts potent antitumor activity in multiple disease contexts, including resistance to standard-of-care ER and CDK4/6 inhibitors. Notably, AR agonists combined with standard-of-care agents enhanced therapeutic responses. Mechanistically, agonist activation of AR altered the genomic distribution of ER and essential co-activators (p300, SRC-3), resulting in repression of ER-regulated cell cycle genes and upregulation of AR target genes, including known tumor suppressors. A gene signature of AR activity positively predicted disease survival in multiple clinical ER-positive breast cancer cohorts. These findings provide unambiguous evidence that AR has a tumor suppressor role in ER-positive breast cancer and support AR agonism as the optimal AR-directed treatment strategy, revealing a rational therapeutic opportunity.
AB - The role of the androgen receptor (AR) in estrogen receptor (ER)-α-positive breast cancer is controversial, constraining implementation of AR-directed therapies. Using a diverse, clinically relevant panel of cell-line and patient-derived models, we demonstrate that AR activation, not suppression, exerts potent antitumor activity in multiple disease contexts, including resistance to standard-of-care ER and CDK4/6 inhibitors. Notably, AR agonists combined with standard-of-care agents enhanced therapeutic responses. Mechanistically, agonist activation of AR altered the genomic distribution of ER and essential co-activators (p300, SRC-3), resulting in repression of ER-regulated cell cycle genes and upregulation of AR target genes, including known tumor suppressors. A gene signature of AR activity positively predicted disease survival in multiple clinical ER-positive breast cancer cohorts. These findings provide unambiguous evidence that AR has a tumor suppressor role in ER-positive breast cancer and support AR agonism as the optimal AR-directed treatment strategy, revealing a rational therapeutic opportunity.
KW - Breast cancer
KW - Preclinical research
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85100216291&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://purl.org/au-research/grants/NHMRC/1084416
UR - http://purl.org/au-research/grants/NHMRC/1130077
UR - http://purl.org/au-research/grants/NHMRC/1093801
U2 - 10.1038/s41591-020-01168-7
DO - 10.1038/s41591-020-01168-7
M3 - Article
C2 - 33462444
AN - SCOPUS:85100216291
SN - 1078-8956
VL - 27
SP - 310
EP - 320
JO - Nature Medicine
JF - Nature Medicine
IS - 2
ER -