TY - JOUR
T1 - The association between disability and risk of exposure to peer cyber victimisation is moderated by gender
T2 - Cross-sectional survey
AU - Emerson, Eric
AU - Aitken, Zoe
AU - King, Tania
AU - Arciuli, Joanne
AU - Llewellyn, Gwynnyth
AU - Kavanagh, Anne M.
PY - 2022/1
Y1 - 2022/1
N2 - Background: Little is known about the exposure of youth with disability to cyber victimisation. Objective: /Hypothesis: To estimate the prevalence of peer cyber and non-cyber victimisation in a nationally representative sample of 14-year-old adolescents with and without disability and to determine whether gender moderates the relationship between disability and exposure to victimisation. Methods: Secondary analysis of data collected in Wave 6 of the UK's Millennium Cohort Survey on 11,726 14-year-old adolescents living in the UK. Results: Adolescents with disability had higher prevalence of cyber and non-cyber victimisation than those with no disability. For cyber victimisation there was a statistically significant interaction between gender and disability, with evidence of increased cyber victimisation for adolescents with disability compared to those with no disability among girls, but not boys. For non-cyber victimisation there was no evidence of an interaction between gender and disability. Conclusions: The prevalence of both cyber and non-cyber victimisation was higher among adolescents with disability than those with no disability. The association between disability and risk of exposure to peer cyber victimisation appears to be moderated by gender.
AB - Background: Little is known about the exposure of youth with disability to cyber victimisation. Objective: /Hypothesis: To estimate the prevalence of peer cyber and non-cyber victimisation in a nationally representative sample of 14-year-old adolescents with and without disability and to determine whether gender moderates the relationship between disability and exposure to victimisation. Methods: Secondary analysis of data collected in Wave 6 of the UK's Millennium Cohort Survey on 11,726 14-year-old adolescents living in the UK. Results: Adolescents with disability had higher prevalence of cyber and non-cyber victimisation than those with no disability. For cyber victimisation there was a statistically significant interaction between gender and disability, with evidence of increased cyber victimisation for adolescents with disability compared to those with no disability among girls, but not boys. For non-cyber victimisation there was no evidence of an interaction between gender and disability. Conclusions: The prevalence of both cyber and non-cyber victimisation was higher among adolescents with disability than those with no disability. The association between disability and risk of exposure to peer cyber victimisation appears to be moderated by gender.
KW - Adults
KW - COVID-19
KW - Disability
KW - Wellbeing
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85110515280&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://purl.org/au-research/grants/NHMRC/1116385
UR - http://purl.org/au-research/grants/ARC/DP150103717
U2 - 10.1016/j.dhjo.2021.101170
DO - 10.1016/j.dhjo.2021.101170
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85110515280
VL - 15
JO - Disability and Health Journal
JF - Disability and Health Journal
SN - 1936-6574
IS - 1
M1 - 101170
ER -