The authors reply

Wendy P. Chaboyer, Lukman Thalib, Emma L. Harbeck, Fiona M. Coyer, Stijn Blot, Claudia F. Bull, Paula C. Nogueira, Frances F. Lin

Research output: Contribution to journalLetterpeer-review

Abstract


We thank Labeau et al (1) for their interest and thoughtful letter about our systematic review of the incidence and prevalence of pressure injuries (PIs) in adult ICU patients (2), recently published article in Critical Care Medicine. We agree heterogeneity was the major threat to validity in pooling the ICU incidence and prevalence and we also agree on the potential sources of heterogeneity. As Labeau et al (1) note, it was not possible to assess most potential causes of heterogeneity in ICU PI events due to paucity of data, which we too identified. The influence of nurses’ workload on PI occurrence is an inconclusive area. One study cited in a review noted that increased ICU nurse staffing in was associated with decreased PI development (3). Internationally, the intensive care environment remains a comparatively well-resourced clinical area. Although we argue adequate staffing levels are important for the prevention of PI, timely regular skin assessment and implementation of prevention strategies based on patient need also strongly influence the outcome of PI development. Because of ICU patients’ disease acuity and complexity, emerging evidence to suggest multicomponent PI prevention programs, especially those with multidisciplinary involvements, are needed (4–6). We too believe PI prevention requires a multidisciplinary approach.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)e162-e163
Number of pages2
JournalCritical Care Medicine
Volume47
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2019
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • authors reply
  • systematic review
  • pressure injuries

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The authors reply'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this