Abstract
This paper revisits the Modigliani-Miller propositions on the optimal financing policy and cost of capital in a dynamic setting. In an environment without taxes and bankruptcy costs, the results are generally consistent with the Modigliani-Miller Propositions 1 and 2. However, the first proposition should be presented and interpreted more carefully, as given firm characteristics, there is only one optimal capital structure. Thus, a firm's capital structure is relevant. A relaxation of assumptions about either taxes or bankruptcy costs leads to conclusions that are generally different from those in Modigliani and Miller (1958). The model predicts that leverage and sales-to-capital ratios decrease but firm size and capital stock increase with the subjective discount factor of the firm's manager if there are taxes and bankruptcy costs. The empirical analysis supports these predictions.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 42-56 |
| Number of pages | 15 |
| Journal | JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE |
| Volume | 48 |
| Early online date | 2014 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Nov 2014 |
Keywords
- Capital structure
- Cost of capital
- Time preferences
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The Cost of Capital and Optimal Financing Policy in a Dynamic Setting'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver