The effect of electrical stimulation on corticospinal excitability is dependent on application duration: A same subject pre-post test design

Rebecca K. Andrews, Siobhan M. Schabrun, Michael C. Ridding, Mary P. Galea, Paul W. Hodges, Lucinda S. Chipchase

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: In humans, corticospinal excitability is known to increase following motor electrical stimulation (ES) designed to mimic a voluntary contraction. However, whether the effect is equivalent with different application durations and whether similar effects are apparent for short and long applications is unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the duration of peripheral motor ES influenced its effect on corticospinal excitability. Methods. The excitability of the corticomotor pathway to abductor pollicis brevis (APB) was measured in fourteen health subjects using transcranial magnetic stimulation before, immediately after and 10 minutes after three different durations (20-, 40-, 60-min) of motor ES (30Hz, ramped). This intervention was designed to mimic a voluntary contraction in APB. To control for effects of motor ES on the peripheral elements (muscle fibre, membrane, neuromuscular junction), maximum compound muscle actions potentials (M-waves) were also recorded at each time point. Results were analysed using a repeated measures analysis of variance. Results: Peripheral excitability was reduced following all three motor ES interventions. Conversely, corticospinal excitability was increased immediately following 20- and 40-min applications of motor ES and this increase was maintained at least 20-min following the intervention. A 60-min application of motor ES did not alter corticospinal excitability. Conclusions: A 20-min application of motor ES that is designed to mimic voluntary muscle contraction is as effective as that applied for 40-min when the aim of the intervention is to increase corticospinal excitability. Longer motor ES durations of 60-min do not influence corticospinal excitability, possibly as a result of homeostatic plasticity mechanisms.

Original languageEnglish
Article number51
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
Volume10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 10 Jun 2013
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

© 2013 Andrews et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Keywords

  • Electrical stimulation therapy
  • Homeostatic plasticity
  • Physical therapy modalities
  • Rehabilitation
  • Transcranial magnetic stimulation

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The effect of electrical stimulation on corticospinal excitability is dependent on application duration: A same subject pre-post test design'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this