Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The Effectiveness of Technological Interventions For Addressing Social Isolation And Loneliness Among Older People: A Systematic Review: Preliminary findings from a mixed methods systematic review of the literature

    Research output: Contribution to conference › Abstract › peer-review

    Abstract

    Abstract
    Background
    Older people were disproportionately impacted by social distancing measures arising from the coronavirus pandemic, increasing their risk of experiencing social isolation and loneliness. Technology is frequently proposed to enhance social engagement; however, few reviews have addressed its efficacy among older people from a theoretical standpoint.

    We addressed three research questions: 1) What is the effectiveness of technology-based interventions in addressing social isolation and loneliness among older people? 2) What are the key barriers and enablers of such interventions? 3) What key theoretical frameworks have informed these interventions?

    Original languageEnglish
    Publication statusPublished - 12 Nov 2021
    Event54th AAG Conference: Innovation in Ageing for the future - Virtual
    Duration: 9 Nov 2021 → 12 Nov 2021
    Conference number: 54th
    https://aag.eventsair.com/QuickEventWebsitePortal/conf2021/programinformation/Agenda (Conference program)

    Conference

    Conference54th AAG Conference
    Abbreviated title54th AAG Conference
    Period9/11/21 → 12/11/21
    Internet address

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
      SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

    Keywords

    • Digital health
    • Isolation
    • Loneliness
    • ageing and aged care
    • Health access

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The Effectiveness of Technological Interventions For Addressing Social Isolation And Loneliness Among Older People: A Systematic Review: Preliminary findings from a mixed methods systematic review of the literature'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this