The effects of explicit “Not Present” and “Don't Know” response options on identification decisions in computer‐administered lineups

Carmen Lucas, Neil Brewer, Zoe E. Michael, Tammie R. Foster

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Eyewitness researchers recommend that “not present” and “don't know” response options should be presented with police lineups. Although it is important that witnesses—most of whom are unlikely to be familiar with the identification task—are fully cognizant of all response options available to them, an understanding of how explicit non-identification options affect performance is lacking. Across four experiments, including 3,633 participants and 8 different stimulus sets, we tested the effects of including non-identification options in computer-administered lineups. When explicit non-identification options were presented, target-present and -absent choosing decreased. This decrease in choosing was characterized by a shift from filler identifications to lineup rejections. ROC analyses revealed that there was no overall difference in discriminability between guilty and innocent suspects depending on response option condition. On balance, the findings suggest that, in addition to informing witnesses about acceptable responses, displaying non-identification response options does not undermine identification performance.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1495-1509
Number of pages15
JournalApplied Cognitive Psychology
Volume34
Issue number6
Early online date3 Aug 2020
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2020

Keywords

  • computerized lineups
  • don't know option
  • explicit non-identification options
  • eyewitness identification
  • not present option

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The effects of explicit “Not Present” and “Don't Know” response options on identification decisions in computer‐administered lineups'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this