The higher you go the less you will know: placing camera traps high to avoid theft will affect detection

Paul D. Meek, Guy A. Ballard, Greg Falzon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Vandalism and theft of camera traps is common, imposing financial and data losses on wildlife professionals. Like many ‘victims’, our response to a spate of thefts was to attempt to install camera traps at heights we suspected would reduce detection and interference by vandals. We sought to determine if placing camera traps above humans’ eye line, to reduce the likelihood of detection and theft by vandals, would compromise predator detection in road-based surveys. Our efforts to resolve this problem led us to discover the importance of placing camera traps at a height commensurate with the height of the animals being studied. Monitoring stations comprised of two camera traps, one at 0.9 m and another at 3 m above ground level, were established at regular intervals along trails during two survey periods. We also conducted a pilot trial to compare vertical (facing downwards) to horizontal (facing across) orientation of camera traps to detect medium-sized mammals. We compared images recorded by the pairs of camera to consider whether height made a significant difference to detections of predators. We found that cameras placed 3 m high and those facing downwards reduced the detection rate of all species compared to those at 0.9 m, so placing camera traps higher than normal significantly compromised our survey data. It is important to note that such data loss would not necessarily be apparent without a robust comparison between deployment strategies. Saving camera traps but concurrently sacrificing data quality is unlikely to be an acceptable outcome for many wildlife professionals. This study reports that placing camera traps too high will reduce the detection of animals and compromise the quality of the survey data.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)204-211
Number of pages8
JournalRemote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation
Volume2
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2016
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.

Keywords

  • Camera trap placement
  • camera trapping
  • detection zone
  • heat-in-motion cameras
  • passive infra-red sensors
  • remote cameras

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The higher you go the less you will know: placing camera traps high to avoid theft will affect detection'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this