Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The IFSO Worldwide One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Survey: Techniques and Outcomes?

  • Ashraf Haddad
  • , Ahmad Bashir
  • , Mathias Fobi
  • , Kelvin Higa
  • , Miguel F. Herrera
  • , Antonio J. Torres
  • , Jacques Himpens
  • , Scott Shikora
  • , Almino Cardoso Ramos
  • , Lilian Kow
  • , Abdelrahman Ali Nimeri

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

34 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: One anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) has become one of the most commonly performed gastric bypass procedures in some countries. Objectives: To assess how surgeons viewed the OAGB, perceptions, indications, techniques, and outcomes, as well as the incidence of short- and long-term complications and how they were managed worldwide. Methods: A questionnaire was sent to all IFSO members in all 5 chapters to study the pattern of practice and outcomes of OAGB. Results: Seven hundred and forty-two surgeons responded. The most commonly performed procedures were sleeve gastrectomy (SG), Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), and OAGB. Preoperatively, 70% of the surgeons performed endoscopy routinely. In regards to weight loss, 83% (570 surgeons) responded that OAGB produces better weight loss than SG, and 49% (342 surgeons) responded that OAGB produces better weight loss than RYGB. The most common length of the biliopancreatic limb (BPL) utilized was 200 cm. Sixty-seven percent of surgeons did not measure the total length of the small bowel. In patients with reflux disease and history of smoking, 53% and 22% of surgeons respectively still offered OAGB as a treatment option. Postoperatively, leak was documented in 963 patients, and it was the leading cause for mortality. Leak management was conservative in 35%. Conversion to RYGB was performed in 31%. In 16% the anastomosis was reinforced, 6% of the patients were reversed, and other procedures were performed in 12%. Revision of OAGB for malnutrition/steatorrhea or severe bile reflux was reported at least once by 37% and 45% of surgeons, respectively (200 cm was the most commonly encountered biliopancreatic limb BPL in those revised for malnutrition). Most common strategy for revision was conversion to RYGB (43%), reversal to normal anatomy (32%), shortening of the BPL (20%), and conversion to SG (5%). Nevertheless, 5 out of 98 mortalities (5%) were due to liver failure/malnutrition. Conclusion: There are infrequent but potentially severe specific complications including malnutrition, liver failure, and bile reflux that may require surgical correction after OAGB.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1411-1421
Number of pages11
JournalObesity Surgery
Volume31
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2021

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 2 - Zero Hunger
    SDG 2 Zero Hunger

Keywords

  • Bile reflux
  • Biliopancreatic limb length
  • Gastric bypass
  • Liver failure
  • Malnutrition
  • Mini gastric bypass
  • One anastomosis gastric bypass
  • Postoperative complications
  • Postoperative leak
  • Revision of one anastomosis gastric bypass

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The IFSO Worldwide One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Survey: Techniques and Outcomes?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this