Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The National Institute for Health Research Hyperacute Stroke Research Centres and the ENCHANTED trial: The impact of enhanced research infrastructure on trial metrics and patient outcomes

  • Thompson G. Robinson
  • , Xia Wang
  • , Alice C. Durham
  • , Gary A. Ford
  • , Joy Liao
  • , Sine Littlewood
  • , Christine Roffe
  • , Philip White
  • , John Chalmers
  • , Craig S. Anderson
  • , ENCHANTED Investigators

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)
55 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: The English National Institute for Health Research Clinical Research Network first established Hyperacute Stroke Research Centres (HSRCs) in 2010 to support multicentre hyperacute (< 9 h) and complex stroke research. We assessed the impact of this investment on research performance and patient outcomes in a post-hoc analysis of country-specific data from a large multicentre clinical trial. Methods: Comparisons of baseline, outcome and trial metric data were made for participants recruited to the alteplase-dose arm of the international Enhanced Control of Hypertension and Thrombolysis Stroke study (ENCHANTED) at National Institute for Health Research Clinical Research Network HSRCs and non-HSRCs between June 2012 and October 2015. Results: Among 774 ENCHANTED United Kingdom participants (41% female; mean age 72 years), 502 (64.9%) were recruited from nine HSRCs and 272 (35.1%) from 24 non-HSRCs. HSRCs had higher monthly recruitment rates (median 1.5, interquartile interval 1.4-2.2 vs. 0.7, 0.5-1.3; p = 0.01) and shorter randomisation-to-treatment times (2.6 vs. 3.1 min; p = 0.01) compared to non-HSRCs. HSRC participants were younger and had milder stroke severity, but clinically important between-group differences in 90-day death or disability outcomes remained after adjustment for minimisation criteria and important baseline variables at randomisation, whether defined by ordinal modified Rankin scale score shift (adjusted OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.62-1.08; p = 0.15), scores 2 to 6 (adjusted OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.50-1.01; p = 0.05), or scores 3 to 6 (adjusted OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.57-1.17; p = 0.27). There was no significant difference in symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage, nor heterogeneity in the comparative treatment effects between low- and standard-dose alteplase by HSRCs or non-HSRCs. Conclusions: Infrastructure investment in HSRCs was associated with improved research performance metrics, particularly recruitment and time to treatment with clinically important, though not statistically significant, improvements in patient outcomes. Trial Registration: Unique identifier: NCT01422616.
Original languageEnglish
Article number19
Number of pages8
JournalHealth Research Policy and Systems
Volume17
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 13 Feb 2019
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
  2. SDG 9 - Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
    SDG 9 Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure

Keywords

  • Acute ischaemic stroke
  • alteplase
  • clinical trials
  • symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage
  • thrombolysis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The National Institute for Health Research Hyperacute Stroke Research Centres and the ENCHANTED trial: The impact of enhanced research infrastructure on trial metrics and patient outcomes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this