The Role of Registry Data in the Evaluation of Mobile-Bearing Total Knee Arthroplasty

Robert Namba, Maria Inacio, Elizabeth Paxton, Otto Robertsson, Stephen Graves

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    15 Citations (Scopus)


    The conventional wisdom that a mobile-bearing design may offer a benefit compared with a fixed-bearing design in total knee arthroplasty has not been supported by evidence. We reviewed the published literature and annual registry reports of all national and regional registries to determine the differences in clinical outcomes between mobile and fixed-bearing designs. We found only single-center reports and studies with small sample sizes in the published literature. These studies did not demonstrate any advantages of mobile bearings over fixed bearings. Moreover, major national joint registries reported higher failure rates associated with mobile-bearing total knee replacement compared with fixed-bearing total knee replacement. Similar findings from a U.S. national study in a community setting suggest that mobile-bearing knees have an increased risk of revision. After harmonization of methodologies, international collaborations of registries may provide the best insight into the performance of mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty in real-world settings.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)48-50
    Number of pages3
    JournalJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume
    Volume93 Suppl 3
    Issue number3
    Publication statusPublished - 21 Dec 2011


    Dive into the research topics of 'The Role of Registry Data in the Evaluation of Mobile-Bearing Total Knee Arthroplasty'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this