Abstract
The International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List is arguably the most popular measure of relative species threat, but its threat categories can be ambiguous (eg "Endangered" versus "Vulnerable") and subjective, have weak quantification, and do not convey the threat status of species in relation to a minimum viable population target. We propose a heuristic measure that describes a "species' ability to forestall extinction", or the SAFE index. We compare the abilities of the SAFE index with those of another numerically explicit metric - percentage range loss - to predict IUCN threat categories using binary and ordinal logistic regression. Generalized linear models showed that the SAFE index was a better predictor of IUCN threat categories than was percentage range loss. We therefore advocate use of the SAFE index, possibly in conjunction with IUCN threat categories, because the former indicates the "distance from extinction" of a species, while implicitly incorporating population viability as a variable.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 521-525 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| Journal | FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT |
| Volume | 9 |
| Issue number | 9 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Nov 2011 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 15 Life on Land
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The SAFE index: using a threshold population target to measure relative species threat'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver