The timing of the literature review in grounded theory research: An open mind versus an empty head

Tracey Giles, Lindy King, Sheryl De Lacey

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    15 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The timing of the literature review in grounded theory has been debated for decades, with previous recommendations to delay the review now under question. Mounting evidence suggests that a preliminary review can enhance theoretical sensitivity and rigor and may lead to innovative insights. However, researchers must acknowledge the influence of prior knowledge during data analysis and theory development to avoid bias. This article critically examines the ongoing debate and recommends that we should not seek to avoid preconceptions but ensure that they are well grounded in evidence and always subject to further investigation, revision, and refutation. If used reflexively, a preliminary literature review may well enhance grounded theory research.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)E29-E40
    Number of pages12
    JournalAdvances in Nursing Science
    Volume36
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2013

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The timing of the literature review in grounded theory research: An open mind versus an empty head'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this