The uses and abuses of phonological assessment

Andrew Butcher

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A number of ready-made phonological assessment procedures have become available to the clinical and educational professions over recent years. It is suggested that the scope of most procedures is unnecessarily narrow; there is no justification for the continuing omission of vowels and prosodic systems from such assessments. The impressionistic transcription on which assessments are based is subjective, imprecise and unreliable. The usefulness of the results, particularly with regard to the measurement of intelligibility and the differential diagnosis of disorders, is much exaggerated. Concern is expressed that clinicians' disillusionment over assessment procedures failing to live up to the claims made for them might lead to a reaction against clinical linguistic procedures in general.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)262-276
Number of pages15
JournalChild Language Teaching and Therapy
Volume5
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 1989
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The uses and abuses of phonological assessment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this