Thick-billed grasswren (Amytornis modestus) songs differ across subspecies and elicit different subspecific behavioural responses

Amy Slender, Marina Louter, Michael Gardner, Sonia Kleindorfer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Passerine song has many functions including mate attraction and territory defence. When songs across populations diverge, this can lead to changes in conspecific recognition and barriers to gene flow, which affect evolutionary processes that could lead to speciation. Two subspecies of thick-billed grasswren (Amytornis modestus) have a parapatric distribution characterised as a narrow region of high genetic admixture where the two subspecies meet. Outside the region of parapatry, the subspecies are genetically and morphologically diverged and weak inter-subspecific gene flow is asymmetric from A. m. indulkanna to A. m. raglessi. We examined the differences between song of A. m. indulkanna and A. m. raglessi and experimentally broadcast each subspecies song to compare territory-holder response in relation to intruder subspecies type. Our aim was to determine if territory owners have a different response to intruders based on the subspecific song type. The song of each subspecies contained unique vocal elements that were absent in the other subspecies. A. m. raglessi responded similarly to con-subspecific and hetero-subspecific intruder song, and A. m. indulkanna responded more often and with greater intensity to hetero- compared to con-subspecific intruder song. The stronger response by A. m. indulkanna towards hetero-subspecific intruders provides a plausible behavioural explanation for the observed patterns of asymmetrical gene flow.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)105-121
Number of pages17
JournalTransactions of the Royal Society of South Australia
Volume142
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Thick-billed grasswren (Amytornis modestus) songs differ across subspecies and elicit different subspecific behavioural responses'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this