‘This is not necessarily a gender thing’: Gender-blind talk of organisational leaders

 Marianne Clausen,  Amanda Le Couteur,  Shona Crabb,  Anna Chur-Hansen,  Niki Vincent

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

How do organisational leaders attend to gender in discussions of men’s flexible work and what are the implications for men’s flexible work? Twelve organisational leaders were interviewed to understand organisational factors that may affect men’s access to and use of flexible work. Workplace gender inequality is related to uneven gendered divisions of work and care. Flexible work has the potential to allow for more equal sharing of care, but it is underused by men. Participants displayed an unexpected pattern during interviews – they avoided talking about men. Inductive qualitative analysis was undertaken, using thematic discourse analysis. Two broad themes were developed from the data, with participants avoiding talking about men, or discussing men and women with regard to traditional gender roles. The themes were found to conform to the theory of gender-blind sexism. Furthermore, we propose an extension of the theory due to a novel finding of gender being maximised. Gender-blind sexism contributes to current understandings of gender inequality, particularly in situations purporting to be gender-neutral, such as modern organisations. We suggest that leaders consider adopting gender sensitive language in order to acknowledge gender, address gender inequality, and facilitate men’s flexible work.

Original languageEnglish
Number of pages21
JournalAustralian Journal of Management
Early online date11 Aug 2025
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 11 Aug 2025
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Flexible work
  • gender-blind sexism
  • gender inequality
  • men
  • J22
  • J16

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '‘This is not necessarily a gender thing’: Gender-blind talk of organisational leaders'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this