TY - JOUR
T1 - ‘Too many assumptions’
T2 - cultural diversity and the politics of inclusion in sexuality education
AU - Mulholland, Monique A
AU - Sanjakdar, Fida
AU - Opie, Tessa
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - For more than a decade, the international and national literature has established that sexuality education does not adequately speak to the broad range of cultural and religious diversities present in classrooms. These persistent obfuscations speak to long-standing questions around normativity, Othering and ‘inclusion’. In this paper, we turn to a recent project that asked young people from a broad range of cultural and religious backgrounds to reflect on their experience of sexuality education. Across a fascinating set of observations, the participants argued that sexuality education rests on ‘too many assumptions’, a range of assumptions that continue to mark them as Other in the classroom. More importantly, they identified a tricky problematic–on the one hand, they want more diversity represented, along with opportunities to explore their views and perspectives. One the other hand, they felt unsure about how this could occur in a safe way, without making them feel ‘on display’, misunderstood, or judged. In the face of this tricky problem, we present a series of insights not only for Australian educators, but for countries across the globe who face similar problems resulting from the obfuscations of largely normative sexuality education frameworks.
AB - For more than a decade, the international and national literature has established that sexuality education does not adequately speak to the broad range of cultural and religious diversities present in classrooms. These persistent obfuscations speak to long-standing questions around normativity, Othering and ‘inclusion’. In this paper, we turn to a recent project that asked young people from a broad range of cultural and religious backgrounds to reflect on their experience of sexuality education. Across a fascinating set of observations, the participants argued that sexuality education rests on ‘too many assumptions’, a range of assumptions that continue to mark them as Other in the classroom. More importantly, they identified a tricky problematic–on the one hand, they want more diversity represented, along with opportunities to explore their views and perspectives. One the other hand, they felt unsure about how this could occur in a safe way, without making them feel ‘on display’, misunderstood, or judged. In the face of this tricky problem, we present a series of insights not only for Australian educators, but for countries across the globe who face similar problems resulting from the obfuscations of largely normative sexuality education frameworks.
KW - critical race theory
KW - cultural diversity
KW - Sexuality education
KW - whiteness
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105002652539&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/14681811.2024.2324011
DO - 10.1080/14681811.2024.2324011
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105002652539
SN - 1468-1811
VL - 25
SP - 309
EP - 323
JO - Sex Education
JF - Sex Education
IS - 3
ER -