TY - JOUR
T1 - Transferring from the poor to the rich
T2 - Examining regressive redistribution in Chinese social insurance programmes
AU - Liu, Junqiang
AU - Liu, Kau
AU - Huang, Yunong
PY - 2016/4/1
Y1 - 2016/4/1
N2 - Social insurance promotes progressive redistribution through risk pooling and cross-subsidy. However, in China, risks and protection are mismatched, with benefits and protection accruing to the privileged while high-risk groups are inadequately protected. This article reports on a study of the sources of regressive redistribution in Chinese pension, health and unemployment insurance programmes, and discusses the possible cause of this redistribution paradox. It argues that the government has adopted different strategies for welfare reform towards different socioeconomic groups. For the core groups, such as public employees, reform has been characterised by replacing old programmes with new (i.e., a replacement strategy). For marginal groups, the government has handed off its responsibilities to individuals and the market (a retrenchment strategy). This political pecking order of welfare reform is the cause of distorted distributional outcomes. As social policy programmes continue to spread in developing countries, China's case illustrates that they may reinforce existing disparities rather than realise progressive redistribution, risk management and social inclusion.
AB - Social insurance promotes progressive redistribution through risk pooling and cross-subsidy. However, in China, risks and protection are mismatched, with benefits and protection accruing to the privileged while high-risk groups are inadequately protected. This article reports on a study of the sources of regressive redistribution in Chinese pension, health and unemployment insurance programmes, and discusses the possible cause of this redistribution paradox. It argues that the government has adopted different strategies for welfare reform towards different socioeconomic groups. For the core groups, such as public employees, reform has been characterised by replacing old programmes with new (i.e., a replacement strategy). For marginal groups, the government has handed off its responsibilities to individuals and the market (a retrenchment strategy). This political pecking order of welfare reform is the cause of distorted distributional outcomes. As social policy programmes continue to spread in developing countries, China's case illustrates that they may reinforce existing disparities rather than realise progressive redistribution, risk management and social inclusion.
KW - China
KW - Political pecking order
KW - Regressive redistribution
KW - Social insurance
KW - Welfare reform
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84930397157&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/ijsw.12172
DO - 10.1111/ijsw.12172
M3 - Article
SN - 1369-6866
VL - 25
SP - 199
EP - 210
JO - International Journal of Social Welfare
JF - International Journal of Social Welfare
IS - 2
ER -