Treatment development: The early years

Tara Galovski, Reginald Nixon, Debra Kaysen

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) are important in determining the efficacy of a given intervention. The control conditions allow us to attribute gains and outcomes to the intervention and not to something else (a different therapy, passage of time, therapeutic alliance, etc.) This chapter reviews the published RCTs testing the efficacy of CPT. We describe the patient population included in the study, the type of trauma that has caused their PTSD, comorbid diagnoses of note, and the types of therapies, conditions, and versions of CPT that were compared to CPT. We also calculated a percent change in PTSD severity scores whenever possible as well as effect sizes (see later for a description). Finally, we provide a summary statement for each study describing the take home message of the study and its clinical relevance to therapists.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationFlexible Applications of Cognitive Processing Therapy
Subtitle of host publicationEvidence-Based Treatment Methods
EditorsTara E. Galovski, Reginald D. V. Nixon, Debra Kaysen
Place of PublicationUnited Kingdom
PublisherElsevier
Chapter3
Pages37-58
Number of pages22
ISBN (Electronic)9780128167151
ISBN (Print)9780128168851
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2020

Keywords

  • CPT outcomes
  • CPT research
  • ecological validity
  • effect sizes
  • literature review
  • methodological challenges
  • randomized clinical trials
  • scientist-practitioner gap
  • therapist stuck points

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Treatment development: The early years'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this