Understanding Esports-related Betting and Gambling: A Systematic Review of the Literature

Harshdeep S Mangat, Mark D Griffiths, Shu M Yu, Katalin Felvinczi, Ronald K Ngetich, Zsolt Demetrovics, Andrea Czakó

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

11 Citations (Scopus)
20 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Esports gambling has steadily grown in popularity alongside esports itself. While research has been increasing in the field of esports-related gambling, no study has yet reviewed the relevant literature on esports gambling. The present study aimed to comprehensively review all empirical research conducted in the wider field of esports gambling. A systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines was undertaken using PsycINFO, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. Only empirical studies were included and were also assessed for potential biases using the ROBUST guidelines. A total of 30 studies from eight countries were included in the review. Esports gamblers were found more likely to be young males, likely to score high on problematic gambling scales, and likely to belong to households speaking a non-English language at home in English speaking countries. Esports gamblers are a unique type of gambling population, with rare characteristics and behaviors compared to other types of gamblers. Given the limited number of studies, there is a need for further research in this field to understand these populations, as well as the need for longitudinal research.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)893-914
Number of pages22
JournalJournal of Gambling Studies
Volume40
Issue number2
Early online date22 Sept 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2024
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Adolescent gambling
  • Esports
  • Esports betting
  • Problem gambling
  • Skin betting
  • Systematic review

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Understanding Esports-related Betting and Gambling: A Systematic Review of the Literature'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this