Abstract
Background Australia is undergoing general practice funding reform, with recent changes to Medicare and the introduction of MyMedicare voluntary patient registration. Objective Within this context, we provide general practitioners (GPs) with an explainer on health economic concepts relevant to current funding reform debates. This article outlines different funding model types, discusses the theoretical advantages and disadvantages of each funding model, and reflects on past experiences of reform. Discussion Common GP funding models across the world include fee for service, capitation, pay for performance and bundled payments. Each funding model has its potential advantages and disadvantages. Blended funding models can minimise undesired consequences of individual funding models but can introduce additional complexity. The challenge remains to design funding models that enable access to quality care, adequately pay providers and are sustainable into the future.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 952-956 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| Journal | Australian Journal of General Practice |
| Volume | 53 |
| Issue number | 12 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Dec 2024 |
Keywords
- general practice funding
- funding models
- funding reform
- Medicare
- health economics
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Understanding general practice funding models in Australia and beyond'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver