Urgent-start Peritoneal Dialysis

Belinda Stallard, David W. Johnson, Htay Htay, Giovanni F.M. Strippoli, Jonathan C. Craig, Yeoungjee Cho

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

Abstract

Peritoneal Dialysis (PD) has several advantages over hemodialysis, including preservation of vasculature for future dialysis access, an initial survival advantage, cost effectiveness, and preservation of residual renal function. This chapter summarizes the evidence to date regarding the definition, prevalence, and outcomes of urgent-start PD. A barrier to broader uptake of urgent-start PD may be attributable to physician practice patterns, which may be largely contributed to by a lack of adequate resources necessary to execute urgent-start PD. Unlike conventional-start PD when initiation of therapy is delayed until at least 2 weeks after catheter insertion to promote wound healing, earlier treatment initiation has raised concerns about an increase in the risk of mechanical complications, such as per catheter leaks. There is a growing burden of patients with end-stage kidney disease worldwide, with increasing numbers of patients commencing on renal replacement therapy.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationEvidence-Based Nephrology, Second Edition
Subtitle of host publicationVolume 2
EditorsJonathan C. Craig, Donald A. Molony, Giovanni F.M. Strippoli
Place of PublicationHoboken, NJ
PublisherWiley
Chapter49
Pages156-169
Number of pages14
Volume2
EditionSecond
ISBN (Electronic)9781119105954
ISBN (Print)9781119105923
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2023

Keywords

  • conventional-start peritoneal dialysis
  • hemodialysis
  • renal replacement therapy
  • urgent-start peritoneal dialysis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Urgent-start Peritoneal Dialysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this