TY - JOUR
T1 - Using ground penetrating radar and resistivity methods to locate unmarked graves
T2 - A review
AU - Berezowski, Victoria
AU - Mallett, Xanthé
AU - Ellis, Justin
AU - Moffat, Ian
PY - 2021/8/1
Y1 - 2021/8/1
N2 - The location of unmarked graves in forensic and archaeological investigations is legally and culturally important. In a forensic context, locating covert burials of missing persons can provide closure to the family, as well as facilitating the successful prosecution of the individual(s) responsible. Archaeologically, burials provide an important source of information about health, diet, physical anthropology, and culture. Despite the importance of these features, the location of unmarked graves with conventional archaeological and forensic techniques, such as excavation, is difficult and expensive. As a result, geophysical techniques have been widely applied to the location of unmarked graves as they are non-invasive, cost and time effective, and avoid the unnecessary disturbance of human remains. This article brings together the literature on ground penetrating radar (GPR), and two resistivity methods, electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) and fixed probe resistivity (FPR), on their ability to locate burials and reviews their use in forensic and archaeological investigations. This paper aims to provide law enforcement personnel, archaeologists, geophysicists, and interested academics with an overview of how these techniques work, how they have been previously applied to grave detection, and the strengths and weakness of these methods.
AB - The location of unmarked graves in forensic and archaeological investigations is legally and culturally important. In a forensic context, locating covert burials of missing persons can provide closure to the family, as well as facilitating the successful prosecution of the individual(s) responsible. Archaeologically, burials provide an important source of information about health, diet, physical anthropology, and culture. Despite the importance of these features, the location of unmarked graves with conventional archaeological and forensic techniques, such as excavation, is difficult and expensive. As a result, geophysical techniques have been widely applied to the location of unmarked graves as they are non-invasive, cost and time effective, and avoid the unnecessary disturbance of human remains. This article brings together the literature on ground penetrating radar (GPR), and two resistivity methods, electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) and fixed probe resistivity (FPR), on their ability to locate burials and reviews their use in forensic and archaeological investigations. This paper aims to provide law enforcement personnel, archaeologists, geophysicists, and interested academics with an overview of how these techniques work, how they have been previously applied to grave detection, and the strengths and weakness of these methods.
KW - Archaeology
KW - Clandestine grave
KW - Electrical resistivity tomography
KW - ERT
KW - Fixed probe resistivity
KW - Forensic science
KW - Geophysical survey
KW - Geophysics
KW - GPR
KW - Ground penetrating radar
KW - Unmarked grave
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85111409594&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://purl.org/au-research/grants/ARC/LE210100037
U2 - 10.3390/rs13152880
DO - 10.3390/rs13152880
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85111409594
VL - 13
JO - Remote Sensing
JF - Remote Sensing
SN - 2072-4292
IS - 15
M1 - 2880
ER -